• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ICI 35868(丙泊酚):一种新型静脉诱导剂。与美索比妥的比较。

ICI 35868 (Diprivan): a new intravenous induction agent. A comparison with methohexitone.

作者信息

Rutter D V, Morgan M, Lumley J, Owen R

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1980 Dec;35(12):1188-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1980.tb05076.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1980.tb05076.x
PMID:6970007
Abstract

ICI 35868 (Diprivan) has been used as an induction agent in patients undergoing minor gynaecological surgery and as the sole anaesthetic agent during bronchoscopy, and its effects were compared with those of methohexitone. The new agent proved to be satisfactory, although induction of anaesthesia was significantly longer than following methohexitone. complications were similar with both drugs. ICI 35868 deserves full investigation as an intravenous anaesthetic agent.

摘要

ICI 35868(丙泊酚)已被用作小型妇科手术患者的诱导麻醉剂以及支气管镜检查期间的唯一麻醉剂,并将其效果与甲己炔巴比妥的效果进行了比较。结果证明这种新药令人满意,尽管其麻醉诱导时间明显长于甲己炔巴比妥。两种药物的并发症相似。ICI 35868作为一种静脉麻醉剂值得进行全面研究。

相似文献

1
ICI 35868 (Diprivan): a new intravenous induction agent. A comparison with methohexitone.ICI 35868(丙泊酚):一种新型静脉诱导剂。与美索比妥的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1980 Dec;35(12):1188-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1980.tb05076.x.
2
Comparison of ICI 35868, etomidate and methohexitone for day-case anaesthesia.ICI 35868、依托咪酯和甲己炔巴比妥用于日间手术麻醉的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1985 Aug;57(8):732-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.8.732.
3
Venous sequelae after intravenous propofol ('Diprivan')--a comparison with methohexitone in short anaesthesia.静脉注射丙泊酚(“得普利麻”)后的静脉后遗症——与美索比妥用于短时间麻醉的比较。
Postgrad Med J. 1985;61 Suppl 3:162-4.
4
Propofol for electroconvulsive therapy. A comparison with methohexitone. Preliminary report.丙泊酚用于电休克治疗:与美索比妥的比较。初步报告
Anaesthesia. 1988 Mar;43 Suppl:61-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09073.x.
5
Comparison of propofol and methohexitone as anaesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy.丙泊酚与美索比妥作为电休克治疗麻醉剂的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1988 Jun;43(6):459-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb06631.x.
6
Propofol in total intravenous anaesthesia without nitrous oxide.丙泊酚用于无氧化亚氮的全静脉麻醉。
Anaesthesia. 1988 Mar;43 Suppl:94-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09085.x.
7
Propofol or methohexitone for induction of anaesthesia for minor gynaecological procedures.丙泊酚或甲己炔巴比妥用于小型妇科手术的麻醉诱导。
S Afr Med J. 1987 Dec 19;72(12):843-5.
8
Comparison of methohexitone and propofol ('Diprivan') for induction of enflurane anaesthesia in outpatients.门诊病人中,美索比妥与丙泊酚(“得普利麻”)用于诱导安氟醚麻醉的比较。
Postgrad Med J. 1985;61 Suppl 3:138-43.
9
Comparison of propofol and methohexitone anaesthesia for thermocoagulation therapy of trigeminal neuralgia.丙泊酚与美索比妥麻醉用于三叉神经痛热凝治疗的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1988 Mar;43 Suppl:50-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09070.x.
10
Single-shot i.v. anaesthesia for outpatient dental surgery. Comparison of 2,6 di-isopropyl phenol and methohexitone.门诊牙科手术的单次静脉麻醉。2,6-二异丙基苯酚与美索比妥的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1987 Feb;59(2):179-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.2.179.

引用本文的文献

1
Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports.异丙酚输注综合征:文献综述及已发表病例报告分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):448-459. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.025. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
2
A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Different Doses of Propofol for Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.评估不同剂量丙泊酚用于气管插管疗效的研究:一项随机临床试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):711-714. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_95_18.
3
Pharmacokinetics, induction of anaesthesia and safety characteristics of propofol 6% SAZN vs propofol 1% SAZN and Diprivan-10 after bolus injection.
单次注射后,6% SAZN丙泊酚与1% SAZN丙泊酚及得普利麻-10的药代动力学、麻醉诱导及安全性特征
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Jun;47(6):653-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00942.x.
4
New drugs--boon or bane? Premedication and intravenous induction agents.新药——福还是祸?术前用药及静脉诱导剂。
Can Anaesth Soc J. 1983 Mar;30(2):166-73. doi: 10.1007/BF03009347.