• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2007 - 2018年在华盛顿州一家大型转诊中心接受治疗的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的临床特征、治疗模式、医疗成本及利用情况

Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Costs and Utilization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients Treated at a Large Referral Center in Washington State 2007-2018.

作者信息

Shankaran Veena, Chennupati Shasank, Sanchez Hayley, Sun Qin, Li Li, Fedorenko Catherine, Aly Abdalla, Healey Marcus, Seal Brian

机构信息

Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021 Dec 14;8:1597-1606. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S328274. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/JHC.S328274
PMID:34938673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8685386/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Though the treatment landscape for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved significantly with the refinement of liver-directed therapy techniques and the introduction of new drugs, few studies have investigated the impact of the changing treatment landscape on lifetime treatment costs, particularly in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease. We sought to investigate real-world clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare costs in a cohort of HCC patients treated at a single high-volume institution in Washington (WA) state.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with HCC between 2007 and 2018 using abstracted electronic medical record (EMR) data linked to cancer registry data and health claims from commercial plans, Medicare, and Medicaid. We described clinical and treatment characteristics, including BCLC stage and Child Pugh score. We investigated median survival and mean lifetime treatment costs by BCLC stage using Kaplan-Meier cost estimator methods. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate factors associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 215 patients, the majority of whom were white (71%), male (68%), and with underlying hepatitis C (61%). Mean per patient lifetime costs were highest in BCLC A and BCLC C patients. Mean lifetime costs in BCLC A patients ($292,134) was driven by surgery, hospital, pharmacy, imaging, and outpatient costs. Chemotherapy costs were highest in BCLC C patients, though not the predominant area of spending. Median survival was highest in patients with BCLC 0 and A disease; BCLC stage C and higher area deprivation index (ADI) were associated with poorer survival.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of WA state HCC patients, mean lifetime costs were highest in patients with BCLC A disease, attributable to surgery and hospital costs. As increased utilization of newer and less toxic therapies improves survival in BCLC C patients, mean lifetime costs in this group may also rise.

摘要

引言

尽管随着肝导向治疗技术的完善和新药的引入,肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗格局有了显著变化,但很少有研究调查治疗格局的变化对终身治疗成本的影响,尤其是在巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)C期疾病方面。我们试图调查华盛顿州一家大型机构治疗的一组HCC患者的真实世界临床特征、治疗模式和医疗成本。

方法

我们对2007年至2018年期间诊断为HCC的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用了与癌症登记数据以及商业保险、医疗保险和医疗补助的健康理赔数据相关联的电子病历(EMR)摘要数据。我们描述了临床和治疗特征,包括BCLC分期和Child Pugh评分。我们使用Kaplan-Meier成本估计方法按BCLC分期调查中位生存期和平均终身治疗成本。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型调查与总生存期相关的因素。

结果

最终队列包括215名患者,其中大多数为白人(71%)、男性(68%),且患有丙型肝炎(61%)。BCLC A期和BCLC C期患者的人均终身成本最高。BCLC A期患者的平均终身成本(292,134美元)由手术、住院、药房、影像和门诊成本驱动。BCLC C期患者的化疗成本最高,尽管不是主要支出领域。BCLC 0期和A期疾病患者的中位生存期最高;BCLC C期和更高的地区贫困指数(ADI)与较差的生存期相关。

结论

在华盛顿州的一组HCC患者中,BCLC A期疾病患者的平均终身成本最高,这归因于手术和住院成本。随着更新且毒性较小的疗法使用增加改善了BCLC C期患者的生存期,该组患者的平均终身成本可能也会上升。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd4/8685386/cec60db4c28d/JHC-8-1597-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd4/8685386/1cf5aa10bad3/JHC-8-1597-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd4/8685386/cec60db4c28d/JHC-8-1597-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd4/8685386/1cf5aa10bad3/JHC-8-1597-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd4/8685386/cec60db4c28d/JHC-8-1597-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Costs and Utilization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients Treated at a Large Referral Center in Washington State 2007-2018.2007 - 2018年在华盛顿州一家大型转诊中心接受治疗的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的临床特征、治疗模式、医疗成本及利用情况
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021 Dec 14;8:1597-1606. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S328274. eCollection 2021.
2
Natural history of untreatable hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.不可治疗性肝细胞癌的自然病史:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Hepatol. 2012 Sep 27;4(9):256-61. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v4.i9.256.
3
Barcelona clinic liver cancer-stage C hepatocellular carcinoma: A novel approach to subclassification and treatment.巴塞罗那临床肝癌-C期肝细胞癌:一种新的亚分类和治疗方法。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(17):e6745. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006745.
4
Healthcare Costs Related to Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Veterans With Cirrhosis in the United States.美国肝硬化退伍军人肝细胞癌治疗相关的医疗费用。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;16(1):106-114.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.07.024. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
5
Survival Predictability Between the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Staging System and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.美国癌症联合委员会第 8 版分期系统与巴塞罗那临床肝癌分类在肝细胞癌患者中的生存预测性比较。
Oncologist. 2021 Mar;26(3):e445-e453. doi: 10.1002/onco.13535. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
6
Intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Argentina: Treatment and survival analysis.阿根廷的中晚期肝细胞癌:治疗和生存分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 21;25(27):3607-3618. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3607.
7
Prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a new stratification of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C: results from a French multicenter study.晚期肝细胞癌的预后:巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期C期的新分层:一项法国多中心研究的结果
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;28(4):433-40. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000558.
8
Surgical resection significantly promotes the overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.手术切除显著提高肝细胞癌患者的总生存率:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 May 14;21(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01807-4.
9
BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: a 20-year survey by the Italian Liver Cancer group.BCLC B期肝细胞癌与经动脉化疗栓塞术:意大利肝癌研究组的20年调查
Liver Int. 2015 Jan;35(1):223-31. doi: 10.1111/liv.12649. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
10
Ascites and alpha-fetoprotein improve prognostic performance of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging.腹水和甲胎蛋白可改善巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期的预后性能。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5654-62. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5654.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A 10-Year Markov Model.奥法妥木单抗与特立氟胺治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益分析:一项10年马尔可夫模型研究
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Mar 20;17:217-232. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S503842. eCollection 2025.
2
Chronobiology of Cancers in the Liver and Gut.肝脏和肠道癌症的生物钟学
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;16(17):2925. doi: 10.3390/cancers16172925.
3
Cost-effectiveness of a precision hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance strategy in patients with cirrhosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination compared with sorafenib as the first-line systemic treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis in China and the United states.阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗对比索拉非尼作为不可切除肝细胞癌患者的一线系统治疗:中国和美国的成本效果分析。
Liver Int. 2021 May;41(5):1097-1104. doi: 10.1111/liv.14795. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
2
Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as a Second-Line Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.帕博利珠单抗作为二线治疗肝细胞癌的成本效益。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033761. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33761.
3
肝硬化患者精准肝细胞癌监测策略的成本效益
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Aug 13;75:102755. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102755. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Area-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Health Care Spending: A Systematic Review.区域层面的社会经济劣势与医疗保健支出:系统综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2356121. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56121.
5
Demographic, clinical and aetiological characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma followed between 2012 and 2017 at University Hospital Joseph Raseta Befelatanana, Antananarivo, Madagascar.2012年至2017年期间在马达加斯加塔那那利佛约瑟夫·拉塞塔·贝费拉塔纳纳大学医院随访的肝细胞癌患者的人口统计学、临床和病因学特征。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Nov 4;16:1466. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1466. eCollection 2022.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Selective Internal Radiotherapy With Yttrium-90 Versus Sorafenib in Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
钇-90 选择性内部放射疗法与索拉非尼治疗局部晚期肝细胞癌的成本效益分析。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Feb;17(2):e266-e277. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00443. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
4
Comparative cost-effectiveness of cabozantinib as second-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Germany and the United States.卡博替尼作为二线治疗药物用于德国和美国晚期肝细胞癌患者的成本效果比较。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 21;20(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01241-y.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ramucirumab treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib with α-fetoprotein concentrations of at least 400 ng/ml.索拉非尼治疗后甲胎蛋白(AFP)至少为 400ng/ml 的进展期肝细胞癌患者使用雷莫芦单抗的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2020 Apr;23(4):347-352. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1707211. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Cabozantinib in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.卡博替尼二线治疗晚期肝细胞癌的成本效益分析。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jun 1;17(6):669-675. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7275.
7
Treatment Patterns and Economic Burden by Lines of Therapy Among Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Systemic Cancer Therapy.接受全身性癌症治疗的晚期肝细胞癌患者按治疗线数划分的治疗模式和经济负担
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2020 Mar;51(1):217-226. doi: 10.1007/s12029-019-00230-z.
8
Neighborhood disadvantage and chronic disease management.邻里劣势与慢性病管理。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):206-216. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13092. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
9
Regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib-A cost-effectiveness analysis.瑞戈非尼治疗索拉非尼治疗后进展的肝细胞癌患者:成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):e0207132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207132. eCollection 2018.
10
The diagnostic and economic impact of contrast imaging techniques in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis.肝硬化小肝癌的对比成像技术的诊断和经济影响。
Gut. 2010 May;59(5):638-44. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.187286. Epub 2009 Dec 1.