Peters Thomas, Creutznacher Robert, Maass Thorben, Mallagaray Alvaro, Ogrissek Patrick, Taube Stefan, Thiede Lars, Uetrecht Charlotte
Institute of Chemistry and Metabolomics, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Institute of Virology and Cell Biology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Biochem Soc Trans. 2022 Feb 28;50(1):347-359. doi: 10.1042/BST20210526.
Infection with human noroviruses requires attachment to histo blood group antigens (HBGAs) via the major capsid protein VP1 as a primary step. Several crystal structures of VP1 protruding domain dimers, so called P-dimers, complexed with different HBGAs have been solved to atomic resolution. Corresponding binding affinities have been determined for HBGAs and other glycans exploiting different biophysical techniques, with mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy being most widely used. However, reported binding affinities are inconsistent. At the extreme, for the same system MS detects binding whereas NMR spectroscopy does not, suggesting a fundamental source of error. In this short essay, we will explain the reason for the observed differences and compile reliable and reproducible binding affinities. We will then highlight how a combination of MS techniques and NMR experiments affords unique insights into the process of HBGA binding by norovirus capsid proteins.
人类诺如病毒感染的首要步骤是通过主要衣壳蛋白VP1附着于组织血型抗原(HBGA)。VP1突出结构域二聚体(即所谓的P-二聚体)与不同HBGA形成复合物的多个晶体结构已解析到原子分辨率。利用不同的生物物理技术测定了HBGA和其他聚糖的相应结合亲和力,其中质谱(MS)和核磁共振(NMR)光谱应用最为广泛。然而,报道的结合亲和力并不一致。极端情况下,对于同一系统,MS检测到结合而NMR光谱却未检测到,这表明存在根本的误差来源。在这篇短文中,我们将解释观察到的差异的原因,并汇总可靠且可重复的结合亲和力。然后,我们将强调MS技术和NMR实验的结合如何为诺如病毒衣壳蛋白与HBGA结合的过程提供独特的见解。