Suppr超能文献

两种估计 QTL 效应加性×加性×加性互作方法的分析和数值比较。

Analytical and numerical comparisons of two methods of estimation of additive × additive × additive interaction of QTL effects.

机构信息

Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637, Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

J Appl Genet. 2022 May;63(2):213-221. doi: 10.1007/s13353-021-00676-7. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

Abstract

This paper presents the analytical and numerical comparison of two methods of estimation of additive × additive × additive (aaa) interaction of QTL effects. The first method takes into account only the plant phenotype, while in the second we also included genotypic information from molecular marker observation. Analysis was made on 150 doubled haploid (DH) lines of barley derived from cross Steptoe × Morex and 145 DH lines from Harrington × TR306 cross. In total, 153 sets of observation was analyzed. In most cases, aaa interactions were found with an exert effect on QTL. Results also show that with molecular marker observations, obtained estimators had smaller absolute values than phenotypic estimators.

摘要

本文对两种估计 QTL 加性×加性×加性(aaa)互作效应的方法进行了分析和数值比较。第一种方法仅考虑植物表型,而第二种方法还包括了来自分子标记观察的基因型信息。分析基于来自 Steptoe × Morex 杂交的 150 个双单倍体(DH)系和 Harrington × TR306 杂交的 145 个 DH 系,共分析了 153 组观测值。在大多数情况下,aaa 互作对 QTL 有显著效应。结果还表明,利用分子标记观察,得到的估计值比表型估计值的绝对值小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/825e/8979904/bfef2805837c/13353_2021_676_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验