Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain.
Grupo de Investigación en Cultura, Educación y Sociedad, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;18(24):12973. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412973.
The present research aimed to study the effect of three different training periodization (traditional, reverse, and free training) on the aerobic performance, motivation, and adherence of physically active athletes. We analysed the adherence to three different periodization training programs: traditional, reverse, and free training periodization on the adherence of amateur triathletes. For this aim, the individual adherence, motivation, and aerobic performance time and heart rate (in a 1000 m running test) were evaluated before and after the completion of the three different 8-week periodization programs. The level of adherence to the reverse periodization was significantly higher than in traditional and free training. The number of dropouts in reverse and traditional periodization was similar but lower than in the free training. Finally, neither of the periodization programs improved aerobic performance and reverse training periodization decreased heart rate of participants in a 1000 m running test.
本研究旨在研究三种不同训练周期(传统、反转和自由训练)对有氧表现、动机和积极运动员的依从性的影响。我们分析了三种不同的周期训练计划(传统、反转和自由训练)对业余铁人三项运动员的依从性。为此,在完成三个不同的 8 周周期计划前后,评估了个体依从性、动机以及有氧表现时间和心率(在 1000 米跑步测试中)。对反转周期的依从性水平显著高于传统和自由训练。在反转和传统周期中,退出人数相似,但低于自由训练。最后,没有一个周期计划能提高有氧表现,而反转训练周期降低了 1000 米跑步测试中参与者的心率。