Suppr超能文献

冲动性和强迫性在赌博障碍中的不同作用。

Discrete Roles for Impulsivity and Compulsivity in Gambling Disorder.

作者信息

Mestre-Bach Gemma, Steward Trevor, Balodis Iris M, DeVito Elise E, Yip Sarah W, George Tony P, Reynolds Brady A, Granero Roser, Fernandez-Aranda Fernando, Jimenez-Murcia Susana, Potenza Marc N

机构信息

Health Sciences School, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, La Rioja, Spain.

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 7;12:789940. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.789940. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Complex associations between gambling disorder (GD) and impulsivity have been identified. However, little is known regarding how compulsivity associates with different impulsivity domains in GD. In this study, we examined associations between self-reported and behavioral measures of impulsivity-assessed through the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) and the Experiential Discounting Task (EDT), respectively- and compulsivity-measured using the Padua Inventory and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), respectively-, in an adult sample with GD ( = 132, 94 men and 38 women, ages ranging from 18 to 69 years). GD severity was assessed using the South Oaks Gambling Screen. Structural Equation Modeling was used to examine relationships between impulsivity and compulsivity measures, age, and GD severity. BIS-11 non-planning and BIS-11 total scores positively correlated with GD severity. The standardized coefficients for the SEM showed direct positive contributions of BIS-11 non-planning, Padua and EDT scores to GD severity. Only participants' ages directly contributed to WCST perseverative errors, and no direct or indirect effects were found with respect to GD severity. The findings suggest that specific aspects of impulsivity and compulsivity contribute to GD severity. Interventions specifically targeting domains that are most relevant to GD severity may improve treatment outcomes.

摘要

赌博障碍(GD)与冲动性之间的复杂关联已被确认。然而,关于强迫性如何与GD中不同的冲动性领域相关联,我们却知之甚少。在本研究中,我们分别通过巴拉特冲动性量表(BIS-11)和经验性折扣任务(EDT)评估冲动性的自我报告和行为测量,以及分别使用帕多瓦量表和威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)测量强迫性,在一个患有GD的成人样本(n = 132,94名男性和38名女性,年龄范围为18至69岁)中进行了研究。使用南橡树赌博筛查量表评估GD的严重程度。采用结构方程模型来检验冲动性和强迫性测量、年龄与GD严重程度之间的关系。BIS-11的非计划性得分和BIS-11总分与GD严重程度呈正相关。结构方程模型的标准化系数显示,BIS-11的非计划性、帕多瓦量表得分和EDT得分对GD严重程度有直接的正向影响。只有参与者的年龄对WCST的持续性错误有直接影响,而在GD严重程度方面未发现直接或间接影响。研究结果表明,冲动性和强迫性的特定方面对GD严重程度有影响。专门针对与GD严重程度最相关领域的干预措施可能会改善治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ab/8689001/f584060fadb8/fpsyt-12-789940-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验