Suppr超能文献

各种形式的对比增强磁共振成像诊断肝细胞癌的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Accuracy of Various Forms of Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zhao Chun, Dai Hongyan, Shao Juwei, He Qian, Su Wei, Wang Peng, Tang Qiuyue, Zeng Junren, Xu Song, Zhao Juanjuan, Xiang Shutian

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 7;11:680691. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.680691. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced MRI can be used to identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, studies around the world have found differing diagnostic accuracies for the technique. Hence, we designed this meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI for HCC diagnosis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search for all studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI for HCC in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar from inception until January 2021. We used the "Midas" package from the STATA software to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Our study was based on 21 publications with 5,361 patients. The pooled HCC diagnosis sensitivity and specificity were 75% (95% CI, 70%-80%) and 90% (95% CI, 88%-92%), respectively, for gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI; and they were 70% (95% CI, 57%-81%) and 94% (95% CI, 85%-97%), respectively, for MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI). We found significant heterogeneity with a significant chi-square test and an statistic >75%. We also found significant publication bias as per Deeks' test results and funnel plot.

CONCLUSION

We found that both types of contrast-enhanced MRI are accurate diagnostic and surveillance tools for HCC and offer high sensitivity and specificity. Further studies on different ethnic populations are required to strengthen our findings.

摘要

背景

对比增强磁共振成像(MRI)可用于识别肝细胞癌(HCC)患者。然而,世界各地的研究发现该技术的诊断准确性存在差异。因此,我们设计了这项荟萃分析以评估对比增强MRI对HCC诊断的准确性。

方法

我们对MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、科学网、SCOPUS、ScienceDirect和谷歌学术搜索数据库中从创建到2021年1月所有报告对比增强MRI对HCC诊断准确性的研究进行了系统检索。我们使用STATA软件中的“Midas”软件包进行荟萃分析。

结果

我们的研究基于21篇文献,涉及5361例患者。对于钆塞酸增强MRI,汇总的HCC诊断敏感性和特异性分别为75%(95%CI,70%-80%)和90%(95%CI,88%-92%);对于细胞外对比剂MRI(ECA-MRI),其敏感性和特异性分别为70%(95%CI,57%-81%)和94%(95%CI,85%-97%)。我们通过显著的卡方检验和I²统计量>75%发现了显著的异质性。根据Deeks检验结果和漏斗图,我们还发现了显著的发表偏倚。

结论

我们发现两种类型的对比增强MRI都是用于HCC的准确诊断和监测工具,具有高敏感性和特异性。需要对不同种族人群进行进一步研究以加强我们的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/449a/8690240/dfc64af8780d/fonc-11-680691-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验