Suppr超能文献

改良 Tardieu 量表作为一种评估成人神经疾病患者上肢痉挛状态的有效性和可靠性的工具:系统评价和叙述性分析。

Validity and reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale as a spasticity outcome measure of the upper limbs in adults with neurological conditions: a systematic review and narrative analysis.

机构信息

School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China

Department of Physiotherapy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 24;11(12):e050711. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050711.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate published evidence on the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) as a tool to assess spasticity in the upper limbs of adults with neurological conditions.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of six electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Physiotherapy Evidence Database) from inception to 31 December 2020. A search strategy was developed using key elements of the research question: population, intervention (action), outcome.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria: (1) adult participants with neurological conditions; (2) upper limb muscles/joints as tested elements; (3) studies testing the MTS and (4) reliability or validity reported.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

(1) non-English articles; (2) non-empirical articles and (3) studies testing the Tardieu Scale.

STUDY APPRAISAL

Evidence quality was evaluated using the US National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies.

RESULTS

Six reliability studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, most articles reported good-to-excellent levels of inter-rater, intrarater and test-retest reliability. However, limitations, such as study design weaknesses, statistical misuses and reporting biases, undermine confidence in reported conclusions. The validity of the MTS also remained questionable based on the results of one study.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This review did not find sufficient evidence to either support or reject the use of the MTS in assessing spasticity in the upper limbs of adults with neurological conditions. Despite the paucity of research evidence, the MTS may still remain a clinically useful tool to measure the motor aspect of spasticity. Future research would benefit from a focus on test standardisation, while the wider field would require the development of a consensual definition of spasticity.

摘要

目的

评估已发表的关于改良 Tardieu 量表(MTS)作为评估成人神经疾病上肢痉挛的工具的证据。

资料来源

从开始到 2020 年 12 月 31 日,对六个电子数据库(PubMed/MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 Physiotherapy Evidence Database)进行了系统检索。使用研究问题的关键要素制定了搜索策略:人群、干预(行动)、结果。

研究入选标准

纳入标准:(1)患有神经疾病的成年参与者;(2)以上肢肌肉/关节为测试要素;(3)测试 MTS 的研究;(4)报告可靠性或有效性。

排除标准

(1)非英文文章;(2)非实证文章;(3)测试 Tardieu 量表的研究。

研究评估

使用美国国立心肺血液研究所用于观察性队列和横断面研究的质量评估工具评估证据质量。

结果

六项可靠性研究符合纳入标准。总体而言,大多数文章报告了很好到很好的观察者间、观察者内和重测信度。然而,研究设计缺陷、统计误用和报告偏倚等局限性削弱了对报告结论的信心。根据一项研究的结果,MTS 的有效性也仍然存在疑问。

结论和影响

本综述没有发现足够的证据来支持或反对在评估成人神经疾病上肢痉挛时使用 MTS。尽管研究证据不足,但 MTS 可能仍然是衡量痉挛运动方面的一种有用的临床工具。未来的研究将受益于对测试标准化的关注,而更广泛的领域将需要制定痉挛的共识定义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb5a/8712979/46fe41810627/bmjopen-2021-050711f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验