• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生基本复苏技能 - 单中心随机模拟试验。

Basic resuscitation skills of medical students - a monocenter randomized simulation trial.

机构信息

Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany.

Immanuel Klinikum Bernau, Herzzentrum Brandenburg, Zentrale Notaufnahme, Bernau bei Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Nov 15;38(7):Doc116. doi: 10.3205/zma001512. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3205/zma001512
PMID:34957321
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8675384/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate resuscitation skills, defined as recognition of resuscitation situations and performance of Basic Life Support (BLS) in students at the Brandenburg Model Medical School (BMM). Participating students (n=102) were randomized to different simulation scenarios: unconscious person with physiological breathing (15/min), gasping (<10/min) and apnea (resuscitation dummy AmbuMan Wireless with electronic recording). Primary endpoint was the proportion of students with correct decision for or against resuscitation. Secondary endpoint was resuscitation quality, self-assessment, and prior resuscitation experience. The latter two were assessed by questionnaire prior to the simulated situation. Overall, there was a high risk for incorrectly omitted or incorrectly performed resuscitation (OR 3.4 [95% CI 1.4-8.1] p=0.005. The highest probability of error occurred in the unconsciousness and gasping groups. 22.3% of all performed resuscitations where at the same time indicated and reached the European Resuscitation Council recommendations for compression frequency, pressure depth and where as well = 90% relieved. A particularly large discrepancy emerged between participants' self-assessment of being prepared for a resuscitation situation by medical school and their actual documented resuscitation competence. The present data indicate significant uncertainty among students in recognizing a resuscitation situation. Even in curricula with a high proportion of practice and a high degree of students with completed vocational training in health care, resuscitation competence is poor.

摘要

本研究旨在评估勃兰登堡模式医科大学(BMM)学生的复苏技能,定义为对复苏情况的识别和基本生命支持(BLS)的实施。参与学生(n=102)被随机分配到不同的模拟场景中:有生理呼吸的无意识者(15/min)、喘息(<10/min)和呼吸暂停(带有电子记录的复苏模拟人 AmbuMan Wireless)。主要终点是正确决定复苏或不复苏的学生比例。次要终点是复苏质量、自我评估和之前的复苏经验。后两者在模拟情况之前通过问卷进行评估。总的来说,不正确省略或不正确实施复苏的风险很高(OR 3.4 [95% CI 1.4-8.1] p=0.005)。在无意识和喘息组中,错误的可能性最高。所有进行的复苏中有 22.3%同时符合欧洲复苏委员会关于按压频率、压力深度的建议,并且同样达到了 90%的缓解率。参与者对医学院准备复苏情况的自我评估与其实际记录的复苏能力之间存在特别大的差异。目前的数据表明,学生在识别复苏情况方面存在很大的不确定性。即使在实践比例高且有大量学生完成医疗保健职业培训的课程中,复苏能力也很差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b91/8675384/fe235b536cab/JME-38-7-116-g-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b91/8675384/4274a69b061c/JME-38-7-116-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b91/8675384/1885da1471bb/JME-38-7-116-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b91/8675384/8a9da16eebe3/JME-38-7-116-t-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b91/8675384/02826050ca98/JME-38-7-116-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b91/8675384/fe235b536cab/JME-38-7-116-g-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b91/8675384/4274a69b061c/JME-38-7-116-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b91/8675384/1885da1471bb/JME-38-7-116-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b91/8675384/8a9da16eebe3/JME-38-7-116-t-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b91/8675384/02826050ca98/JME-38-7-116-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b91/8675384/fe235b536cab/JME-38-7-116-g-002.jpg

相似文献

1
Basic resuscitation skills of medical students - a monocenter randomized simulation trial.医学生基本复苏技能 - 单中心随机模拟试验。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Nov 15;38(7):Doc116. doi: 10.3205/zma001512. eCollection 2021.
2
Medical and Physician Assistant Student Competence in Basic Life Support: Opportunities to Improve Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training.医疗和医师助理学生的基本生命支持能力:改善心肺复苏培训的机会。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 15;22(1):101-107. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.11.48536.
3
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Paper 2: A survey of basic life support training for medical students.心肺复苏。第2篇:医学生基础生命支持培训调查
J Accid Emerg Med. 1994 Sep;11(3):165-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.11.3.165.
4
Teaching school children basic life support improves teaching and basic life support skills of medical students: A randomised, controlled trial.教授小学生基本生命支持可提高医学生的教学和基本生命支持技能:一项随机对照试验。
Resuscitation. 2016 Nov;108:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.08.020. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
5
The effect of peer-group size on the delivery of feedback in basic life support refresher training: a cluster randomized controlled trial.同伴小组规模对基础生命支持复习培训中反馈传递的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 4;16:167. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0682-5.
6
Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?视频反馈分析能否提高五年级医学生的心肺复苏表现?
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 12;16(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0726-x.
7
Pre-training evaluation and feedback improved skills retention of basic life support in medical students.预培训评估和反馈提高了医学生基本生命支持技能的保持率。
Resuscitation. 2013 Sep;84(9):1274-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 May 9.
8
The effects of teaching basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation--a comparison between first and sixth year medical students.基础心肺复苏术教学的效果——一年级与六年级医学生的比较
Resuscitation. 2006 Mar;68(3):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.07.017. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
9
Certified Basic Life Support Instructors Identify Improper Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Poorly: Instructor Assessments Versus Resuscitation Manikin Data.认证基础生命支持指导员对不当心肺复苏技能的识别能力较差:指导员评估与复苏人体模型数据的对比。
Simul Healthc. 2019 Oct;14(5):281-286. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000386.
10
Comparison of a newly established emotional stimulus approach to a classical assessment-driven approach in BLS training: a randomised controlled trial.基础生命支持培训中一种新建立的情感刺激方法与传统评估驱动方法的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 22;8(2):e017705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017705.

引用本文的文献

1
Should basic life support-defibrillator training be compulsory for newly licensed Italian physicians? An observational study.新获得行医资格的意大利医生是否应该必修基础生命支持-除颤器培训?一项观察性研究。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2024 Aug 1;25(8):632-636. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001645. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
SIMED-New Doc course, a matter of reflection.SIMED-新文档课程,值得反思。
Acta Biomed. 2023 Feb 13;94(1):e2023035. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i1.13959.
3
What do we mean by "lessons learned"? Medical didactic research deficits before the post-COVID era. A call!

本文引用的文献

1
In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, is the positioning of victims by bystanders adequate for CPR? A cohort study.在院外心脏骤停中,旁观者对受害者的体位摆放是否适合进行心肺复苏?一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 23;10(9):e037676. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037676.
2
The need to overcome the lack of CPR competencies in healthcare students in Europe.欧洲医学生需要克服心肺复苏技能不足的问题。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;320:100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
External Cardiac Massage Training of Medical Students: A Randomized Comparison of Two Feedback Methods to Standard Training.
我们所说的“经验教训”是什么意思?新冠疫情后时代之前医学教学研究的不足。呼吁!
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Nov 15;38(7):Doc125. doi: 10.3205/zma001521. eCollection 2021.
医学生体外心脏按摩培训:两种反馈方法与标准培训的随机比较。
J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;59(2):270-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.04.058. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
4
Final-year medical students' knowledge of cardiac arrest and CPR: We must do more!医学生对心脏骤停和心肺复苏术的了解:我们必须做得更多!
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 1;296:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
5
Improving Community Survival Rates from Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.提高院外心脏骤停患者的社区生存率。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2018;14(2):79-84. doi: 10.2174/1573403X14666180507160555.
6
Overconfidence among beginners: Is a little learning a dangerous thing?初学者的过度自信:一知半解是否危险?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Jan;114(1):10-28. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000102. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
Does lying in the recovery position increase the likelihood of not delivering cardiopulmonary resuscitation?平卧位是否会增加心肺复苏不实施的可能性?
Resuscitation. 2017 Jun;115:173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
8
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and patient survival outcome in cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心肺复苏质量与心搏骤停患者生存结局:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.036. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
9
Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停的早期心肺复苏。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2307-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405796.
10
Abnormal breathing of sudden cardiac arrest victims described by laypersons and its association with emergency medical service dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction.外行人描述的心脏骤停受害者的异常呼吸及其与紧急医疗服务调度员辅助心肺复苏指导的关联。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Apr;32(4):314-7. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203112. Epub 2014 Jan 8.