Suppr超能文献

南加州医护人员对新冠疫苗的接受度与犹豫度的预测因素:并非仅仅是“反疫苗”与“支持疫苗”的对立

Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers in Southern California: Not Just "Anti" vs. "Pro" Vaccine.

作者信息

Dubov Alex, Distelberg Brian J, Abdul-Mutakabbir Jacinda C, Beeson W Lawrence, Loo Lawrence K, Montgomery Susanne B, Oyoyo Udochukwu E, Patel Pranjal, Peteet Bridgette, Shoptaw Steven, Tavakoli Shahriyar, Chrissian Ara A

机构信息

School of Behavioral Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA.

School of Pharmacy, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Dec 2;9(12):1428. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9121428.

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the status of and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination of healthcare workers in two major hospital systems (academic and private) in Southern California. Responses were collected via an anonymous and voluntary survey from a total of 2491 participants, including nurses, physicians, other allied health professionals, and administrators. Among the 2491 participants that had been offered the vaccine at the time of the study, 2103 (84%) were vaccinated. The bulk of the participants were middle-aged college-educated White (73%), non-Hispanic women (77%), and nursing was the most represented medical occupation (35%). Political affiliation, education level, and income were shown to be significant factors associated with vaccination status. Our data suggest that the current allocation of healthcare workers into dichotomous groups such as "anti-vaccine vs. pro-vaccine" may be inadequate in accurately tailoring vaccine uptake interventions. We found that healthcare workers that have yet to receive the COVID-19 vaccine likely belong to one of four categories: the misinformed, the undecided, the uninformed, or the unconcerned. This diversity in vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers highlights the importance of targeted intervention to increase vaccine confidence. Regardless of governmental vaccine mandates, addressing the root causes contributing to vaccine hesitancy continues to be of utmost importance.

摘要

在本研究中,我们评估了南加州两个主要医院系统(学术性和私立性)医护人员的新冠疫苗接种状况及态度。通过一项匿名自愿调查,我们收集了总共2491名参与者的回复,这些参与者包括护士、医生、其他专职医疗人员和管理人员。在研究时已获得疫苗接种机会的2491名参与者中,2103人(84%)接种了疫苗。大部分参与者是中年、受过大学教育的白人(73%)、非西班牙裔女性(77%),且护理是占比最大的医疗职业(35%)。政治派别、教育水平和收入被证明是与疫苗接种状况相关的重要因素。我们的数据表明,目前将医护人员划分为“反疫苗与支持疫苗”等二分法群体,可能不足以准确制定提高疫苗接种率的干预措施。我们发现,尚未接种新冠疫苗的医护人员可能属于以下四类之一:信息错误者、犹豫不决者、信息不了解者或漠不关心者。医护人员在疫苗犹豫问题上的这种多样性凸显了针对性干预以增强疫苗信心的重要性。无论政府的疫苗强制令如何,解决导致疫苗犹豫的根本原因仍然至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed16/8706436/daf18dcef800/vaccines-09-01428-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验