Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Feb;23(2):e13500. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13500. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based investigations into radiotherapy (RT)-induced cardiotoxicity require reliable registrations of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to planning computed tomography (CT) for correlation to regional dose. In this study, the accuracy of intra- and inter-modality deformable image registration (DIR) of longitudinal four-dimensional CT (4D-CT) and MR images were evaluated for heart, left ventricle (LV), and thoracic aorta (TA).
Non-cardiac-gated 4D-CT and T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (T1-VIBE) MRI datasets from five lung cancer patients were obtained at two breathing phases (inspiration/expiration) and two time points (before treatment and 5 weeks after initiating RT). Heart, LV, and TA were manually contoured. Each organ underwent three intramodal DIRs ((A) CT modality over time, (B) MR modality over time, and (C) MR contrast effect at the same time) and two intermodal DIRs ((D) CT/MR multimodality at same time and (E) CT/MR multimodality over time). Hausdorff distance (HD), mean distance to agreement (MDA), and Dice were evaluated and assessed for compliance with American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group (TG)-132 recommendations.
Mean values of HD, MDA, and Dice under all registration scenarios for each region of interest ranged between 8.7 and 16.8 mm, 1.0 and 2.6 mm, and 0.85 and 0.95, respectively, and were within the TG-132 recommended range (MDA < 3 mm, Dice > 0.8). Intramodal DIR showed slightly better results compared to intermodal DIR. Heart and TA demonstrated higher registration accuracy compared to LV for all scenarios except for HD and Dice values in Group A. Significant differences for each metric and tissue of interest were noted between Groups B and D and between Groups B and E. MDA and Dice significantly differed between LV and heart in all registrations except for MDA in Group E.
DIR of the heart, LV, and TA between non-cardiac-gated longitudinal 4D-CT and MRI across two modalities, breathing phases, and pre/post-contrast is acceptably accurate per AAPM TG-132 guidelines. This study paves the way for future evaluation of RT-induced cardiotoxicity and its related factors using multimodality DIR.
基于磁共振成像(MRI)的放射治疗(RT)诱导性心脏毒性研究需要可靠的磁共振(MR)成像注册,以便将规划计算机断层扫描(CT)与区域剂量相关联。在这项研究中,评估了纵向四维 CT(4D-CT)和 MR 图像的 intra-和 inter-模态变形图像配准(DIR)的准确性,用于心脏、左心室(LV)和胸主动脉(TA)。
从五例肺癌患者获得非心脏门控 4D-CT 和 T1 容积内插屏气检查(T1-VIBE)MRI 数据集,分别在两个呼吸阶段(吸气/呼气)和两个时间点(治疗前和开始 RT 后 5 周)。手动描绘心脏、LV 和 TA。每个器官进行三次 intramodal DIR((A)CT 模态随时间变化,(B)MR 模态随时间变化,(C)MR 对比效应同时发生)和两次 intermodal DIR((D)CT/MR 多模态同时发生,(E)CT/MR 多模态随时间变化)。评估了 Hausdorff 距离(HD)、平均同意距离(MDA)和 Dice,并评估了其是否符合美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)任务组(TG)-132 建议。
对于每个感兴趣区域的所有配准方案,HD、MDA 和 Dice 的平均值范围分别为 8.7 至 16.8 毫米、1.0 至 2.6 毫米和 0.85 至 0.95,均在 TG-132 推荐范围内(MDA<3 毫米,Dice>0.8)。与 intermodal DIR 相比,intramodal DIR 显示出稍好的结果。除了组 A 中的 HD 和 Dice 值外,心脏和 TA 对于所有方案的注册准确性均高于 LV。对于每个感兴趣的组织,组 B 和 D 之间以及组 B 和 E 之间的每个度量和感兴趣的组织都存在显著差异。除了组 E 中的 MDA 之外,LV 和心脏之间的所有注册中,MDA 和 Dice 都存在显著差异。
根据 AAPM TG-132 指南,在两种模态、两个呼吸阶段和前后对比的非心脏门控纵向 4D-CT 和 MRI 之间,心脏、LV 和 TA 的 DIR 是可接受的。这项研究为使用多模态 DIR 评估放射治疗诱导性心脏毒性及其相关因素铺平了道路。