Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
School of AI Convergence, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Dec 27;36(50):e340. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e340.
People face many obstacles to overcoming crisis in life and proactively manage life crises. This study aimed to evaluate the association of self-management strategy with subjective health and well-being for the general South Korean population.
We recruited 1,200 respondents using an equal-probability sampling method from March to May 2018. A questionnaire including life version of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT-Life), the five Health Status Questionnaire, Short Form-12, McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) was administered to participants.
In multiple stepwise logistic regression model adjusted with basic demographic variables (age, sex, region, education and monthly income level), core strategy was independently associated with physical, mental, social, spiritual, and general health status (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 1.97-2.92). Preparation strategy was independently associated with physical, mental, spiritual, and general health status (aORs, 2.36-3.31). Implementation strategy was independently associated with physical, social, spiritual, and general health status (aORs, 2.22-2.42). Core strategy and implementation strategy were independently associated with higher Physical Component Score (aORs, 2.21-2.29) and higher Mental Component Score (aORs, 1.68-1.76). Core strategy and preparation strategy were independently associated with lower PHQ-9 (aORs, 2.63-3.74). Pearson's correlation coefficients between scores on SAT-Life and the other factors (MQOL social support, MQOL spiritual well-being, and SWLS) explain having significant correlations ranging from 0.41-0.43.
Self-management strategies of health might be encouraged to manage subjective health and well-being outcomes.
人们在克服生活危机和主动管理生活危机方面面临诸多障碍。本研究旨在评估自我管理策略与韩国普通人群主观健康和幸福感之间的关系。
我们于 2018 年 3 月至 5 月采用等概率抽样法招募了 1200 名受访者。调查内容包括生活版健康评估智能管理策略工具(SAT-Life)、五健康状况问卷、简易健康调查量表 12 项(SF-12)、麦吉尔生活质量问卷(MQOL)、患者健康问卷 9 项(PHQ-9)和生活满意度量表(SWLS)。
在调整基本人口统计学变量(年龄、性别、地区、教育程度和月收入水平)的多步逻辑回归模型中,核心策略与身体、心理、社会、精神和总体健康状况呈独立相关(调整后的优势比[aOR],1.97-2.92)。准备策略与身体、心理、精神和总体健康状况呈独立相关(aOR,2.36-3.31)。实施策略与身体、社会、精神和总体健康状况呈独立相关(aOR,2.22-2.42)。核心策略和实施策略与较高的生理成分评分(aOR,2.21-2.29)和较高的心理成分评分(aOR,1.68-1.76)独立相关。核心策略和准备策略与 PHQ-9 评分较低独立相关(aOR,2.63-3.74)。SAT-Life 得分与其他因素(MQOL 社会支持、MQOL 精神健康和 SWLS)之间的皮尔逊相关系数解释为具有显著相关性,范围为 0.41-0.43。
健康自我管理策略可能有助于管理主观健康和幸福感结果。