Ratcliffe Elizabeth, Subramaniam Sharmila, Ngu Wee Sing, McConnell Susan, Beales Ian L P, McCrudden Raymond, Smith Geoff V, Wells Christopher
Endoscopy department, Wrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Leigh, UK.
Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 22;13(1):39-44. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2020-101734. eCollection 2022.
Training in gastrointestinal endoscopy in the UK occurs predominantly in a real world one-to-one trainer to trainee interaction. Previous surveys have shown surgical and gastroenterology trainees have had mixed experiences of supervision and training, and no surveys have explored specifically the role of trainee to trainer feedback. This study aimed to explore the experience of training and of providing trainer feedback for all disciplines of endoscopy trainees.
DESIGN/METHOD: An online survey designed in collaboration with Joint Advisory Committee training committee and trainee representatives was distributed from January 2020 but was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic and hence terminated early.
There were 129 responses, including trainees from all disciplines and regions, of which 86/129 (66.7%) rated the culture in their endoscopy units favourably-either good or excellent. 65/129 (50.4%) trainees reported having one or more training lists allocated per week, with 41/129 (31.8%) reporting only ad hoc lists. 100/129 (77.5%) respondents were given feedback and 97/129 (75.2%) were provided with learning points from the list. 65/129 (50.4%) respondents reported their trainer completed a direct observation of procedure or direct observation of polypectomies. 73/129 (56.6%) respondents reported that they felt able to give feedback to their trainer, with 88/129 (68.2%) feeling they could do this accurately. Barriers to trainer feedback cited included time constraints, lack of anonymity and concerns about affecting the trainer-trainee relationship.
Overall, the training environment has improved since previous surveys. There are still issues around interdisciplinary differences with some surgical trainees finding the training environment less welcoming, and trainee perceptions of hierarchical barriers and trainer responsiveness to feedback limiting the accuracy of their feedback.
在英国,胃肠内镜检查培训主要是在现实环境中由培训师与学员进行一对一互动。此前的调查显示,外科和胃肠病学学员在监督和培训方面的经历好坏参半,且尚无调查专门探讨学员对培训师反馈的作用。本研究旨在探究内镜检查学员各学科在培训及提供培训师反馈方面的经历。
设计/方法:与联合咨询委员会培训委员会及学员代表合作设计的在线调查于2020年1月发布,但因新冠疫情中断,因此提前终止。
共收到129份回复,包括来自所有学科和地区的学员,其中86/129(66.7%)对其内镜检查科室的氛围给予好评——良好或优秀。65/129(50.4%)的学员报告每周分配有一个或多个培训清单,41/129(31.8%)报告只有临时清单。100/129(77.5%)的受访者得到了反馈,97/129(75.2%)从清单中获得了学习要点。65/129(50.4%)的受访者报告其培训师完成了对操作或息肉切除术的直接观察。73/129(56.6%)的受访者表示他们觉得能够向培训师提供反馈,88/129(68.2%)觉得自己能够准确地做到这一点。提到的培训师反馈障碍包括时间限制、缺乏匿名性以及担心影响培训师与学员的关系。
总体而言,自上次调查以来培训环境有所改善。跨学科差异方面仍存在问题,一些外科培训学员觉得培训环境不那么友好,学员对等级障碍的认知以及培训师对反馈的反应能力限制了他们反馈的准确性。