Segal Jonathan, Siau Keith, Kanagasundaram Cynthia, Askari Alan, Dunckley Paul, Morris Allan John
Gastroenterology, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 30;11(6):430-435. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101345. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Competence in endoscopic haemostasis for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is typically expected upon completion of gastroenterology training. However, training in haemostasis is currently variable without a structured training pathway. We conducted a national gastroenterology trainee survey on haemostasis exposure and on attitudes and barriers to training.
A 24-item electronic survey was distributed to UK gastroenterology trainees covering the following domains: demographics, training setup, attitudes and barriers, confidence in managing AUGIB independently and exposure to individual haemostatic modalities (supervised and independent). Responses were analysed by region and training grade to assess potential variation in training.
A total of 181 trainees completed the questionnaire (response rate 33.5%). There was significant variation in AUGIB training setup across the UK (p<0.001), with 22.7% of trainees declaring no access to structured or ad hoc training. 31.5% expressed confidence in managing AUGIB independently; this varied by trainee grade (0% of first-year specialty trainees (ST3s) to 60.7% of final-years (ST7s)) and by training setup (p=0.001). ST7 trainees reported lack of experience with independently applying glue (86%), Hemospray (54%), heater probe (36%) and variceal banding (36%). Overall, 88% of trainees desired additional haemostasis training and 89% indicated support for a national certification process to ensure competence in AUGIB.
AUGIB training in the UK is variable. The majority of gastroenterology trainees lacked confidence in haemostasis management and desired additional training. Training provision should be urgently reviewed to ensure that trainees receive adequate haemostasis exposure and are competent by completion of training.
完成胃肠病学培训后,通常期望具备急性上消化道出血(AUGIB)的内镜止血能力。然而,目前止血培训缺乏系统性,培训方式各异。我们针对止血培训经历以及培训的态度和障碍开展了一项全国性胃肠病学实习医生调查。
向英国胃肠病学实习医生发放了一份包含24个项目的电子调查问卷,涵盖以下领域:人口统计学、培训设置、态度和障碍、独立处理AUGIB的信心以及各种止血方式的培训经历(带教和独立操作)。按地区和培训级别对回复进行分析,以评估培训的潜在差异。
共有181名实习医生完成了问卷(回复率33.5%)。英国各地的AUGIB培训设置存在显著差异(p<0.001),22.7%的实习医生表示没有机会接受结构化或临时培训。31.5%的人表示有信心独立处理AUGIB;这因实习医生级别(第一年专科实习医生(ST3)中无人表示有信心,而最后一年(ST7)中有60.7%表示有信心)和培训设置而异(p=0.001)。ST7实习医生报告称,独立应用胶水(86%)、喷洒凝血酶(54%)、热探头(36%)和静脉曲张套扎术(36%)的经验不足。总体而言,88%的实习医生希望接受更多止血培训,89%的人表示支持开展全国认证程序以确保具备处理AUGIB的能力。
英国的AUGIB培训存在差异。大多数胃肠病学实习医生对止血管理缺乏信心,希望接受更多培训。应紧急审查培训安排,以确保实习医生在培训结束时能获得足够的止血培训并具备相应能力。