Suppr超能文献

松散褐煤绝热自然发火期快速对比试验研究

Rapid Contrastive Experimental Study on the Adiabatic Spontaneous Combustion Period of Loose Lignite.

作者信息

Dong Ziwen, Sun Lifeng, Jia Tinggui, Guo Shengli, Geng Weile, Yu Wenhui, Pi Zikun, Li Guangli, Luo Chen

机构信息

School of Safety Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China.

Emergency Research Institute, China Coal Research Institute CCRI, Beijing 100013, China.

出版信息

ACS Omega. 2021 Dec 10;6(50):34989-35001. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05667. eCollection 2021 Dec 21.

Abstract

The adiabatic spontaneous combustion period of coal is an important index for the macroscopic characterization of coal spontaneous combustion, and it is affected by many internal and external factors. There are several methods to study it, but there are various shortcomings to these methods. Some require too much time, while others have too many interfering factors. To quickly obtain the accurate adiabatic spontaneous combustion period of coal, a rapid contrastive experimental method was designed. In this method, the coal samples of the experimental and control groups were the same, and air and nitrogen were used as control atmospheres. A theoretical calculation method for the adiabatic spontaneous combustion period based on this method is proposed. The experimental results showed that during the temperature-programmed coal spontaneous combustion experiment, the increase in the coal temperature was due to physical and chemical heating. Physical heating is the heating effect of the temperature-programmed furnace body and the heated gas on the coal sample. Chemical heating includes oxidative exothermic heating promoted by physical and adiabatic oxidation heating. The adiabatic oxidative heat release can be determined by the oxidation heat release in the air atmosphere minus the oxidation heat release corresponding to the coal sample temperature in the nitrogen environment at the same period. The adiabatic spontaneous combustion period of coal can be calculated from the adiabatic oxidation heat release. Our results provide a rapid contrastive experimental method to quickly obtain the accurate adiabatic spontaneous combustion period of coal.

摘要

煤的绝热自然发火期是表征煤自然发火的一个重要宏观指标,受诸多内外部因素影响。研究煤的绝热自然发火期有多种方法,但这些方法都存在各种不足。有的方法耗时过长,有的则干扰因素过多。为快速获得煤准确的绝热自然发火期,设计了一种快速对比实验方法。该方法中实验组和对照组的煤样相同,分别以空气和氮气作为对照气氛。基于此方法提出了一种绝热自然发火期的理论计算方法。实验结果表明,在程序升温煤自然发火实验过程中,煤体温度升高是物理加热和化学加热共同作用的结果。物理加热是程序升温炉体及被加热气体对煤样的加热作用。化学加热包括物理促进的氧化放热加热和绝热氧化加热。绝热氧化放热量可通过空气气氛中的氧化放热量减去同期氮气环境中对应煤样温度的氧化放热量来确定。煤的绝热自然发火期可根据绝热氧化放热量计算得出。我们的研究结果提供了一种快速对比实验方法,可快速获得煤准确的绝热自然发火期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3831/8697611/f9f44af17c59/ao1c05667_0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验