Suppr超能文献

与阿昔洛韦相比,蜂蜜和蜂胶对单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)引起的损伤的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of honey and propolis, compared to acyclovir, against Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)-induced lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Rocha Marina Pereira, Amorim Juliana Mendes, Lima William Gustavo, Brito Júlio César Moreira, da Cruz Nizer Waleska Stephanie

机构信息

Departamento de Produtos Farmacêuticos, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Fundação Ezequiel Dias FUNED, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

J Ethnopharmacol. 2022 Apr 6;287:114939. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.114939. Epub 2021 Dec 26.

Abstract

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Apitherapy is a branch of traditional medicine that uses bee products to manage numerous diseases. In this context, the antiherpetic effect of these bee products has been demonstrated in some studies with some controversial results.

AIM OF THE STUDY

Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of honey and propolis with acyclovir, the reference drug, in the treatment of cold sores and genital herpes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The selection of eligible studies was conducted through the search in Pubmed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and Electronic Scientific Library.

RESULTS

The search yielded 147 articles, of which nine were considered eligible for analysis. The analysis of these studies showed that the healing property of propolis is superior to that obtained for acyclovir (95% CI: 2.70 to 8.25; p = 0.0001). Furthermore, honey also presented a better healing effect than acyclovir against Herpes simplex virus-induced wounds (95% CI: 3.58 to -0.19; p = 0.03), inducing complete re-epithelization of herpetic lesions after 8 days, while for acyclovir, the healing time average was 9 days. It also provoked a similar reduction of pain caused by herpetic compared to acyclovir (95% CI: 2.27 to -0.42; p = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, these results confirm the use of honey and propolis as potent antiherpetic agents.

摘要

民族药理学相关性

蜂疗是传统医学的一个分支,利用蜂产品治疗多种疾病。在此背景下,一些研究已证实这些蜂产品具有抗疱疹作用,但结果存在一定争议。

研究目的

因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较蜂蜜和蜂胶与对照药物阿昔洛韦在治疗唇疱疹和生殖器疱疹方面的有效性。

材料与方法

通过检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆、LILACS和电子科学图书馆来筛选合格的研究。

结果

检索共得到147篇文章,其中9篇被认为符合分析条件。对这些研究的分析表明,蜂胶的愈合特性优于阿昔洛韦(95%置信区间:2.70至8.25;p = 0.0001)。此外,蜂蜜对单纯疱疹病毒引起的伤口也表现出比阿昔洛韦更好的愈合效果(95%置信区间:3.58至 -0.19;p = 0.03),能在8天后使疱疹性损伤完全重新上皮化,而阿昔洛韦的平均愈合时间为9天。与阿昔洛韦相比,它还能使疱疹引起的疼痛有类似程度的减轻(95%置信区间:2.27至 -0.42;p = 0.18)。

结论

总体而言,这些结果证实了蜂蜜和蜂胶可作为有效的抗疱疹药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验