Kostyk S K, Grobstein P
Neuroscience. 1987 Apr;21(1):41-55. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(87)90323-x.
We have studied the effects on frog orienting behavior of three lesions: unilateral optic nerve section, unilateral tectal lobe ablation, and unilateral transverse hemisection of the neuraxis at a level just caudal to the optic tectum. Unilateral optic nerve section and unilateral tectal lobe ablation produce very similar deficits in visually elicited responses to prey items, an absence of responses for stimuli at locations within the monocular field of one eye. Unilateral hemisection, in contrast, results in abnormalities in visually elicited responses over a wider area, encompassing the entire ipsilateral visual hemifield. The hemisection deficit also differs in character from that following optic nerve section or tectal lesion. Within the affected hemifield, frogs do not fail to respond to stimuli but rather respond with abnormally directed movements. The movements, regardless of stimulus eccentricity on the horizontal, are always forwardly directed. While not varying with horizontal eccentricity, the movements do vary with stimulus elevation and distance. The variation with stimulus distance in the affected hemifield is somewhat different from that in the opposite hemifield. We conclude from the behavior that remains after hemisection lesions that there must exist bilateral descending tectofugal paths capable of triggering movements which vary with stimulus elevation and distance, and a crossed descending tectofugal path capable of triggering turns into one visual hemifield. That the deficit area is larger following a hemisection than following tectal lobe ablation indicates that the hemisection has affected the ability of both tectal lobes to trigger turns in one direction. A possible interpretation of this finding is that the lesion has interrupted not only the crossed descending tectofugal path from one tectal lobe but an uncrossed descending tectofugal path from the other. This hypothetical pathway as well as the others mentioned is incorporated in a model of the organization of the post-tectal circuitry involved in orienting.
单侧视神经切断、单侧顶盖叶切除,以及在视神经顶盖尾侧水平对神经轴进行单侧横向半切。单侧视神经切断和单侧顶盖叶切除在视觉诱发的对猎物的反应中产生非常相似的缺陷,即对一只眼睛单眼视野内的刺激无反应。相比之下,单侧半切导致在更广泛区域的视觉诱发反应异常,包括整个同侧视觉半野。半切缺陷在性质上也与视神经切断或顶盖损伤后的不同。在受影响的半野内,青蛙并非对刺激无反应,而是以异常定向的运动做出反应。这些运动,无论水平方向上刺激的离心率如何,总是向前的。虽然不随水平离心率变化,但运动会随刺激的高度和距离而变化。受影响半野中随刺激距离的变化与对侧半野有所不同。我们从半切损伤后残留行为得出结论,必定存在能够触发随刺激高度和距离变化的运动的双侧顶盖离顶盖下行通路,以及能够触发转向一个视觉半野的交叉顶盖离顶盖下行通路。半切后缺陷区域比顶盖叶切除后更大,这表明半切影响了两个顶盖叶触发向一个方向转动的能力。对这一发现的一种可能解释是,损伤不仅中断了来自一个顶盖叶的交叉顶盖离顶盖下行通路,还中断了来自另一个顶盖叶的未交叉顶盖离顶盖下行通路。这个假设的通路以及提到的其他通路被纳入了一个参与定向的顶盖后神经回路组织模型中。