Rink Lena, Adams Anne, Braun Cora, Bschor Tom, Kuhr Kathrin, Baethge Christopher
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany,
Red Cross Children's Hospital Siegen, Siegen, Germany,
Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(2):84-93. doi: 10.1159/000520554. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
Selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) are among the most prescribed antidepressants, and dose escalation is a frequently applied strategy after non-response to an initially prescribed dose.
This meta-analysis aimed to find evidence of a dose-response relationship or to the contrary in direct comparisons of different SNRI doses in patients with major depressive disorder.
A systematic literature search for RCTs comparing at least two doses of SNRIs was carried out in CENTRAL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. Doses were classified as high, medium, and low according to manufacturers' product monographs and analyses at the level of SNRIs as a group and for single substances, accompanied by sensitivity network meta-analyses (Prospero CRD42018081031).
From 2,070 studies screened, we included 26 studies with a total of 10,242 patients. Comparisons of medium versus low and high versus medium doses resulted in clinically and statistically non-significant standardized mean differences of -0.06 (-0.16 to 0.04) and -0.06 (-0.16 to 0.03) in favor of higher doses. In the analyses of single substances, no statistically significant results emerged, and many contrasts yielded very small effect sizes. Dropouts due to side effects tended to be more frequent with higher doses. Heterogeneity was low. Network meta-analyses of direct comparisons supported the findings, as did a risk of bias analysis.
Based on the lack of positive evidence for a dose-response relationship in SNRIs as a group and in single SNRIs, we recommend prescribing medium doses. In case of insufficient response, we do not recommend increasing the dose of SNRIs.
选择性5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)是最常被处方的抗抑郁药之一,在对初始处方剂量无反应后,增加剂量是一种常用策略。
本荟萃分析旨在寻找重度抑郁症患者不同SNRI剂量直接比较中剂量-反应关系的证据或相反证据。
在CENTRAL、PubMed、PsycINFO和EMBASE中对比较至少两种SNRI剂量的随机对照试验进行系统文献检索。根据制造商的产品说明书,剂量分为高、中、低,并对SNRI作为一组以及单一物质进行分析,同时进行敏感性网络荟萃分析(Prospero CRD42018081031)。
从筛选的2070项研究中,我们纳入了26项研究,共10242名患者。中剂量与低剂量以及高剂量与中剂量的比较得出临床和统计学上无显著差异的标准化均数差分别为-0.06(-0.16至0.04)和-0.06(-0.16至0.03),倾向于高剂量。在单一物质分析中,未出现统计学显著结果,许多对比的效应量非常小。高剂量时因副作用导致的脱落往往更频繁。异质性较低。直接比较的网络荟萃分析支持这些发现,偏倚风险分析也是如此。
基于SNRI作为一组以及单一SNRI缺乏剂量-反应关系的阳性证据,我们建议处方中剂量。如果反应不足,我们不建议增加SNRI的剂量。