Wolfe Mary K, McDonald Noreen C, Arunachalam Saravanan, Baldauf Richard, Valencia Alejandro
Department of City & Regional Planning, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, U.S.A.
Institute for the Environment, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, U.S.A.
J Urban Aff. 2020 Jul 7;43(8). doi: 10.1080/07352166.2020.1734013.
The role of school location in children's air pollution exposure and ability to actively commute is a growing policy issue. Well-documented health impacts associated with near-roadway exposures have led school districts to consider school sites in cleaner air quality environments requiring school bus transportation. We analyze children's traffic-related air pollution exposure across an average Detroit school day to assess whether the benefits of reduced air pollution exposure at cleaner school sites are eroded by the need to transport students by bus or private vehicle. We simulated two school attendance scenarios using modeled hourly pollutant concentrations over the school day to understand how air pollution exposure may vary by school location and commute mode. We found that busing children from a high-traffic neighborhood to a school 19 km away in a low-traffic environment resulted in average daily exposures 2 to 3 times higher than children walking to a local school. Health benefits of siting schools away from high-volume roadways may be diminished by pollution exposure during bus commutes. School districts cannot simply select sites with low levels of air pollution, but must carefully analyze tradeoffs between location, transportation, and pollution exposure.
学校位置在儿童空气污染暴露及主动通勤能力方面所起的作用,是一个日益受到关注的政策问题。与道路附近暴露相关的、有充分记录的健康影响,促使学区考虑将学校选址在空气质量更清洁的环境中,这就需要校车运输。我们分析了底特律普通学校日中儿童与交通相关的空气污染暴露情况,以评估在空气更清洁的学校选址所带来的减少空气污染暴露的益处,是否会因需要用校车或私家车接送学生而被抵消。我们利用上学日每小时的模拟污染物浓度,模拟了两种学校出勤情况,以了解空气污染暴露如何因学校位置和通勤方式而有所不同。我们发现,将来自交通繁忙社区的儿童用校车送到19公里外交通流量小的环境中的学校,其日均暴露量比步行去当地学校的儿童高出2至3倍。在高流量道路附近选址建校所带来的健康益处,可能会因校车通勤期间的污染暴露而减弱。学区不能简单地选择空气污染水平低的地点,而必须仔细分析位置、交通和污染暴露之间的权衡。