Suppr超能文献

学生上下学期间的交通工具排放:教育政策的影响。

Vehicle emissions during children's school commuting: impacts of education policy.

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Mar 1;44(5):1537-43. doi: 10.1021/es902932n.

Abstract

We explore how school policies influence the environmental impacts of school commutes. Our research is motivated by increased interest in school choice policies (in part because of the U.S. "No Child Left Behind" Act) and in reducing bus service to address recent budget shortfalls. Our analysis employs two samples of elementary-age children, age 5-12: a travel survey (n = 1246 respondents) and a school enrollment data set (n = 19,655 students). Multinomial logistic regression modeled the determinants of travel mode (automobile, school bus, and walking; n = 803 students meeting selection criteria). Travel distance has the single greatest effect on travel mode, though school choice, trip direction (to- or from-school), and grade play a role. Several policies were investigated quantitatively to predict the impact on school travel, vehicle emissions, and costs. We find that eliminating district-wide school choice (i.e., returning to a system with neighborhood schools only) would have significant impacts on transport modes and emissions, whereas in many cases proposed shifts in school choice and bus-provision policies would have only modest impacts. Policies such as school choice and school siting may conflict with the goal of increasing rates of active (i.e., nonmotorized) school commuting. Policies that curtail bus usage may reduce bus emissions but yield even larger increases in private-vehicle emissions. Our findings underscore the need to critically evaluate transportation-related environmental and health impacts of currently proposed changes in school policy.

摘要

我们探讨了学校政策如何影响学生上下学交通的环境影响。我们的研究源于对学校选择政策(部分原因是美国“不让一个孩子掉队”法案)的兴趣增加,以及为了解决最近的预算短缺而减少巴士服务的兴趣增加。我们的分析采用了两个年龄在 5-12 岁的小学生样本:一个出行调查(n=1246 名受访者)和一个学校招生数据集(n=19655 名学生)。多项逻辑回归模型分析了出行方式(汽车、校车和步行;n=803 名符合选择标准的学生)的决定因素。出行距离对出行方式的影响最大,但学校选择、出行方向(上下学)和年级也有影响。我们还定量研究了几项政策,以预测其对学校出行、车辆排放和成本的影响。我们发现,取消全区范围内的学校选择(即恢复只有邻里学校的系统)将对交通模式和排放产生重大影响,而在许多情况下,拟议的学校选择和校车配置政策的转变只会产生适度的影响。诸如学校选择和学校选址等政策可能与提高积极(即非机动化)上下学交通比例的目标相冲突。削减巴士使用的政策可能会减少巴士排放,但会导致私人车辆排放更大幅度的增加。我们的研究结果强调需要对目前提出的学校政策变化对交通相关环境和健康影响进行批判性评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验