• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Community-Engaged Approach to Environmental Health Research: Process and Lessons Learned.社区参与式环境健康研究方法:过程与经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(4):533-540. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0043.
2
Voices of Community Partners: Perspectives Gained from Conversations of Community-Based Participatory Research Experiences.社区合作伙伴的声音:从基于社区的参与式研究经验的对话中获得的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;17(14):5245. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145245.
3
A Participatory Group Process within a Health Collaborative to Collect and Disseminate Needs Assessment Data.参与式小组流程在健康协作中收集和传播需求评估数据。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(3):285-297. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0034.
4
Community-university partnerships in community-based research.基于社区的研究中的社区-大学伙伴关系。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Winter;6(4):463-9. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0053.
5
Health Impacts of Perchlorate and Pesticide Exposure: Protocol for Community-Engaged Research to Evaluate Environmental Toxicants in a US Border Community.高氯酸盐和农药暴露对健康的影响:美国边境社区评估环境毒物的社区参与研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 11;10(8):e15864. doi: 10.2196/15864.
6
Community Partner Perspectives on Benefits, Challenges, Facilitating Factors, and Lessons Learned from Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships in Detroit.社区合作伙伴对底特律基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的益处、挑战、促进因素及经验教训的看法
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):299-311. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0031.
7
Recognizing Cross-Institutional Fiscal and Administrative Barriers and Facilitators to Conducting Community-Engaged Clinical and Translational Research.认识进行社区参与的临床和转化研究的跨机构财务和行政障碍及促进因素。
Acad Med. 2021 Apr 1;96(4):558-567. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003893.
8
Incorporating community-based participatory research principles into environmental health research: challenges and lessons learned from a housing pilot study.将基于社区的参与性研究原则纳入环境卫生研究:住房试点研究的挑战与经验教训
J Environ Health. 2014 Jun;76(10):8-17.
9
The Development of a Collaborative Self-Evaluation Process for Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships Using the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model and Other Adaptable Tools.利用基于社区的参与性研究概念模型和其他适用工具,为基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系开发协作式自我评估过程。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(3):225-235. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0050.
10
Are We the Problem? A Call to Action for Addressing Institutional Challenges to Engaging Community Partners in Research.我们是问题所在吗?呼吁解决机构挑战,以促使社区伙伴参与研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 17;21(2):236. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020236.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation Tools for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Health Research: A Scoping Review.健康研究中患者及公众参与(PPI)的评估工具:一项范围综述
Patient. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00765-3.
2
Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Gene-Environment Interaction Research.基因-环境相互作用研究的伦理、法律和社会影响
Genet Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;49(1):e22591. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22591. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3
Bringing Multisectoral and Multidisciplinary Stakeholders Together to Optimize Environmental Health Research.汇聚多部门和多学科利益相关者以优化环境卫生研究。
Geohealth. 2023 Feb 20;7(2):e2022GH000746. doi: 10.1029/2022GH000746. eCollection 2023 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Health disparities in jail populations: Mixed methods and multi-disciplinary community engagement for justice and health impacts.监狱人群中的健康差异:用于司法和健康影响的混合方法与多学科社区参与
Pract Anthropol. 2019 Fall;41(4):2-16. doi: 10.17730/0888-4552.41.4.2.
2
Impact of Participatory Health Research: A Test of the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model.参与式健康研究的影响:对基于社区的参与式研究概念模型的检验。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Apr 24;2018:7281405. doi: 10.1155/2018/7281405. eCollection 2018.
3
Qualitative Research and Community-Based Participatory Research: Considerations for Effective Dissemination in the Peer-Reviewed Literature.定性研究与基于社区的参与性研究:医学专业学术文献中有效传播的考量因素
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):275-82. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0041.
4
Evaluating community engagement in global health research: the need for metrics.评估全球卫生研究中的社区参与:对衡量指标的需求。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jul 1;16:44. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0033-9.
5
Applying the community partnership approach to human biology research.将社区伙伴关系方法应用于人类生物学研究。
Am J Hum Biol. 2015 Jan-Feb;27(1):6-15. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22652. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
6
Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity.基于社区的参与性研究概念模型:社区伙伴咨询与表面效度
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):117-35. doi: 10.1177/1049732314557084. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
7
A diagnostic evaluation model for complex research partnerships with community engagement: the partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention (NACP) model.一种用于具有社区参与的复杂研究伙伴关系的诊断评估模型:美国原住民癌症预防伙伴关系(NACP)模型。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Feb;48:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
8
Stress and sociocultural factors related to health status among US-Mexico border farmworkers.与美墨边境农场工人健康状况相关的压力和社会文化因素。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2014 Dec;16(6):1176-82. doi: 10.1007/s10903-013-9853-1.
9
Hazard-ranking of agricultural pesticides for chronic health effects in Yuma County, Arizona.亚利桑那州尤马县慢性健康影响的农业农药危害分级。
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Oct 1;463-464:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.051. Epub 2013 Jun 16.
10
Community-engaged research perspectives: then and now.社区参与式研究视角:过去与现在。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Mar-Apr;13(2):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2012.12.006.

社区参与式环境健康研究方法:过程与经验教训。

A Community-Engaged Approach to Environmental Health Research: Process and Lessons Learned.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(4):533-540. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0043.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2021.0043
PMID:34975035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8812205/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study used a community-engaged approach to examine associations between environmental contaminants and health outcomes among residents of Yuma, Arizona. Our team conducted a process evaluation to assess scientific rigor and adherence to community engagement principles.

OBJECTIVE

Our evaluation focused on four dimensions of community-based participatory research: 1) context, 2) group dynamics, 3) intervention and research, and 4) outcomes.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted with key informants from community partner organizations. Thematic analysis was used to evaluate community partners' experiences with our collaborative process.

LESSONS LEARNED

Community partners reported collaborating to establish research goals, recruit participants, collect data, plan analyses, and formulate dissemination strategies. Training needs, roles, and expectations of community partners varied based on available resources, prior research experience, and perceived research challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Leveraging community-engaged principles for studies of environmental contamination can expedite recruitment efforts and stimulate action to improve health outcomes.

摘要

背景

本研究采用社区参与的方法,检查亚利桑那州尤马市居民的环境污染物与健康结果之间的关联。我们的团队进行了一项过程评估,以评估科学严谨性和对社区参与原则的遵守情况。

目的

我们的评估集中在社区参与性研究的四个方面:1)背景,2)群体动态,3)干预和研究,以及 4)结果。

方法

对社区伙伴组织的主要知情人进行了访谈。采用主题分析来评估社区合作伙伴对我们合作过程的经验。

经验教训

社区合作伙伴报告说,他们合作制定了研究目标、招募参与者、收集数据、计划分析以及制定传播策略。培训需求、社区合作伙伴的角色和期望因可用资源、先前的研究经验和感知的研究挑战而异。

结论

利用社区参与原则进行环境污染物研究可以加快招募工作,并激发改善健康结果的行动。