• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服咪达唑仑联合或不联合鼻内给予S-氯胺酮用于儿童术前用药的最佳剂量:一项随机、双盲、序贯剂量探索试验。

The optimal dose of oral midazolam with or without intranasal S-ketamine for premedication in children: a randomised, double blinded, sequential dose-finding trial.

作者信息

Bian Yong, Zhou Siyi, Hou Huiyan, Xu Tao, Huang Yue

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Transl Pediatr. 2021 Nov;10(11):2941-2951. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-247.

DOI:10.21037/tp-21-247
PMID:34976760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8649604/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral administration of midazolam syrup is one of the most favorable methods of premedication, the optimal dose of midazolam and midazolam with S-ketamine for preschool children has not been determined. This prospective, double-blind, randomized, sequential dose-finding study was designed to estimate the 90% effective doses of oral midazolam with and without intranasal S-ketamine in a grade III child medical center.

METHODS

Eighty successive children were recruited and randomly allocated to midazolam group and midazolam with S-ketamine group. The initial oral doses of midazolam were 0.25 mg/kg in both groups, and the dose of midazolam for the next child was based on the response of the preceding child as the biased coin up-and-down designed. The primary outcome was parental separation anxiety score = 1 throughout the period of transferring from premedication center to the operation room 30 min after premedication. Secondary outcomes were the preoperative and post-operative observations. Finally, the 90% effective dose and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by isotonic regression.

RESULTS

The 90% effective dose of oral midazolam or oral midazolam with intranasal S-ketamine was 0.461 mg/kg (95% confidence interval: 0.425-0.488) and 0.253 mg/kg (95% confidence interval: 0.242-0.278), respectively. Oral midazolam with intranasal S-ketamine was quicker onset (8.9±3.8 19.7±7.4 min, P<0.001), had less incidence of behavioral changes (7.5% 32.5%, P=0.010) and faster recovery (21.6±14.1 31.6±13.5 min, P=0.002) than solely oral midazolam.

CONCLUSIONS

A suggestion of oral midazolam 0.3 mg/kg with intranasal small dose of S-ketamine could be used as premedication for preschool children.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.

摘要

背景

口服咪达唑仑糖浆是最常用的术前用药方法之一,但尚未确定学龄前儿童使用咪达唑仑及咪达唑仑与S-氯胺酮联合使用的最佳剂量。本前瞻性、双盲、随机、序贯剂量探索研究旨在评估在一家三级儿童医疗中心口服咪达唑仑单独使用及联合鼻内给予S-氯胺酮时的90%有效剂量。

方法

连续招募80名儿童,随机分为咪达唑仑组和咪达唑仑联合S-氯胺酮组。两组咪达唑仑初始口服剂量均为0.25mg/kg,下一名儿童的咪达唑仑剂量根据前一名儿童的反应按照偏倚硬币上下法确定。主要结局为用药30分钟后从术前用药中心转运至手术室期间家长分离焦虑评分为1。次要结局为术前和术后观察结果。最后,通过等渗回归估计90%有效剂量和95%置信区间。

结果

口服咪达唑仑或口服咪达唑仑联合鼻内给予S-氯胺酮的90%有效剂量分别为0.461mg/kg(95%置信区间:0.425-0.488)和0.253mg/kg(95%置信区间:0.242-0.278)。口服咪达唑仑联合鼻内给予S-氯胺酮起效更快(8.9±3.8对19.7±7.4分钟,P<0.001),行为改变发生率更低(7.5%对32.5%,P=0.010),恢复更快(21.6±14.1对31.6±13.5分钟,P=0.002)。

结论

建议口服0.3mg/kg咪达唑仑联合鼻内给予小剂量S-氯胺酮可作为学龄前儿童的术前用药。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/980c/8649604/b9fbdff3c431/tp-10-11-2941-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/980c/8649604/18af4b5ac9d6/tp-10-11-2941-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/980c/8649604/302d3b2da304/tp-10-11-2941-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/980c/8649604/2160bb1e196e/tp-10-11-2941-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/980c/8649604/b9fbdff3c431/tp-10-11-2941-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/980c/8649604/18af4b5ac9d6/tp-10-11-2941-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/980c/8649604/302d3b2da304/tp-10-11-2941-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/980c/8649604/2160bb1e196e/tp-10-11-2941-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/980c/8649604/b9fbdff3c431/tp-10-11-2941-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
The optimal dose of oral midazolam with or without intranasal S-ketamine for premedication in children: a randomised, double blinded, sequential dose-finding trial.口服咪达唑仑联合或不联合鼻内给予S-氯胺酮用于儿童术前用药的最佳剂量:一项随机、双盲、序贯剂量探索试验。
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Nov;10(11):2941-2951. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-247.
2
Oral preanaesthetic medication for children: double-blind randomized study of a combination of midazolam and ketamine vs midazolam or ketamine alone.儿童术前口服麻醉用药:咪达唑仑与氯胺酮联合用药对比单独使用咪达唑仑或氯胺酮的双盲随机研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Mar;84(3):335-40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013435.
3
Oral ketamine or midazolam or low dose combination for premedication in children.口服氯胺酮或咪达唑仑或低剂量联合用药用于儿童术前用药。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004 Apr;32(2):246-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0403200214.
4
A comparative study of paediatric oral premedication: midazolam, ketamine and low dose combination of midazolam and ketamine.小儿口腔术前用药的比较研究:咪达唑仑、氯胺酮及咪达唑仑与氯胺酮低剂量联合用药
J Indian Med Assoc. 2011 Jun;109(6):386-8.
5
Comparison of ease of administration of intranasal midazolam spray and oral midazolam syrup by parents as premedication to children undergoing elective surgery.家长将鼻内咪达唑仑喷雾剂和口服咪达唑仑糖浆作为择期手术患儿术前用药时给药便利性的比较。
J Anesth. 2017 Jun;31(3):351-357. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2330-6. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
6
Low- versus high-dose combination of midazolam-ketamine for oral premedication in children for ophthalmologic surgeries.咪达唑仑-氯胺酮低剂量与高剂量联合用于眼科手术患儿的口腔预给药。
Singapore Med J. 2011 Jul;52(7):512-6.
7
Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam Premedication for Children Undergoing Dental Rehabilitation.经鼻给予右美托咪定与口服氯胺酮对比经鼻给予咪达唑仑用于牙科修复儿童术前用药的比较
Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 6;9(1):e85227. doi: 10.5812/aapm.85227. eCollection 2019 Feb.
8
Efficacy and safety of intranasal midazolam versus intranasal ketamine as sedative premedication in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.鼻内咪达唑仑与鼻内氯胺酮作为小儿患者镇静预用药的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01892-2.
9
Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy.比较雾化用右美托咪定、氯胺酮或咪达唑仑在学龄前儿童行骨髓活检前用药的效果。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;121(2):445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.039. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
10
Comparison of oral midazolam with intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication for children undergoing CT imaging: a randomized, double-blind, and controlled study.口服咪达唑仑与鼻内右美托咪定用于儿童CT成像术前用药的比较:一项随机、双盲对照研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jan;27(1):37-44. doi: 10.1111/pan.13010. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Intranasal esketamine versus esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination for premedication in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery: a randomized controlled trial.鼻内给予艾司氯胺酮与艾司氯胺酮-右美托咪定联合用药用于斜视手术小儿患者的术前用药:一项随机对照试验。
Transl Pediatr. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1327-1335. doi: 10.21037/tp-24-45. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Combined sedation in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: determination of median effective dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with oral midazolam.小儿磁共振成像中联合镇静:鼻内给予右美托咪定联合口服咪达唑仑的中位有效剂量的确定。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Mar 23;24(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02493-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Study of Oral Midazolam Syrup and Intranasal Midazolam Spray for Sedative Premedication in Pediatric Surgeries.口服咪达唑仑糖浆与鼻内咪达唑仑喷雾剂用于小儿外科手术镇静前用药的比较研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):370-375. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_182_18.
2
Comparison of Oral Triclofos and Oral Midazolam as Premedication in Children undergoing Elective Surgery.口服三氯福司与口服咪达唑仑作为择期手术儿童术前用药的比较。
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):366-369. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_13_19.
3
Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam Premedication for Children Undergoing Dental Rehabilitation.
The 50% effective dose of hydromorphone and morphine for epidural analgesia in the hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind, sequential dose-finding study.
氢吗啡酮和吗啡用于痔疮手术后硬膜外镇痛的半数有效剂量:一项双盲、序贯剂量探索研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jan 30;24(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02420-0.
经鼻给予右美托咪定与口服氯胺酮对比经鼻给予咪达唑仑用于牙科修复儿童术前用药的比较
Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 6;9(1):e85227. doi: 10.5812/aapm.85227. eCollection 2019 Feb.
4
A novel, palatable paediatric oral formulation of midazolam: pharmacokinetics, tolerability, efficacy and safety.咪达唑仑新型美味儿科口服液体制剂:药代动力学、耐受性、疗效和安全性。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Dec;73(12):1469-1477. doi: 10.1111/anae.14318. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
5
S(+)-ketamine : Current trends in emergency and intensive care medicine.S(+)-氯胺酮:急诊与重症医学的当前趋势
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018 May;130(9-10):356-366. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1299-3. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
6
Premedication with melatonin vs midazolam: efficacy on anxiety and compliance in paediatric surgical patients.褪黑素与咪达唑仑术前用药:对小儿外科手术患者焦虑及依从性的影响
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul;176(7):947-953. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2933-9. Epub 2017 May 24.
7
Comparison of ease of administration of intranasal midazolam spray and oral midazolam syrup by parents as premedication to children undergoing elective surgery.家长将鼻内咪达唑仑喷雾剂和口服咪达唑仑糖浆作为择期手术患儿术前用药时给药便利性的比较。
J Anesth. 2017 Jun;31(3):351-357. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2330-6. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
8
The effects of minimal-dose versus low-dose S-ketamine on opioid consumption, hyperalgesia, and postoperative delirium: a triple-blinded, randomized, active- and placebo-controlled clinical trial.小剂量与低剂量 S-氯胺酮对阿片类药物消耗、痛觉过敏和术后谵妄的影响:一项三盲、随机、阳性和安慰剂对照的临床试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Oct;82(10):1069-1076. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
9
Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine-ketamine for premedication in pediatrics patients: A randomized double-blind study.小儿患者术前使用鼻内右美托咪定与右美托咪定-氯胺酮的比较:一项随机双盲研究。
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):349-55. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.172340.
10
Comparison of nasal Midazolam with Ketamine versus nasal Midazolam as a premedication in children.鼻内咪达唑仑与氯胺酮联用与鼻内咪达唑仑单独作为儿童术前用药的比较。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Jan;8(1):17-21. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.125904.