Suppr超能文献

与无氧能力和容量相关的运动表现衡量指标的日常变化:系统评价。

Daily variation in performance measures related to anaerobic power and capacity: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Exercise and Sports Science, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Chronobiol Int. 2022 Mar;39(3):421-455. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1994585. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

Abstract

Numerous functional measures related to anaerobic performance display daily variation. The diversity of tests and protocols used to assess anaerobic performance related to diurnal effects and the lack of a standardized approach have hindered agreement in the literature. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate and systematically review the evidence relating to time-of-day differences in anaerobic performance measures. The entire content of PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, SPORTDiscus® ( EBSCOhost) and Web of Science and multiple electronic libraries were searched. Only experimental research studies conducted in male adult participants aged ≥ 18 yrs before May 2021 were included. Studies assessing tests related to anaerobic capacity or anaerobic power between a minimum of two time-points during the day (morning evening) were deemed eligible. The primary search revealed that a total of 55 out of 145 articles were considered eligible and subsequently included. Thirty-nine studies assessed anaerobic power and twenty-five anaerobic capacity using different modes of exercise and test protocols. Forty-eight studies found several of their performance variables to display time-of-day effects, with higher values in the evening than the morning, while seven studies did not find any time-of-day significance in any variables which were assessed. The magnitude of difference is dependent on the modality and the exercise protocol used. Performance measures for anaerobic power found jump tests displayed 2.7 to 12.3% differences, force velocity tests ~8% differences, sprint tests 2.7 to 11.3% differences and 5-m multiple shuttle run tests 3.7 to 13.1% differences in favour of the evening. Performance measures for anaerobic capacity found Wingate test to display 1.8 to 11.7% differences and repeated sprint tests to display 3.4 to 10.2% differences. The only test not to display time-of-day differences was the running based anaerobic sprint test (RAST). Time-of-day variations in anaerobic performance has previously been partially explained by higher core-body and/or muscle temperature and better muscle contractile properties in the afternoon, although recent findings suggest that differences in methodology, motivation/arousal, habitual training times and chronotypes could provide additional explanations. There is a clear demand for a rigorous, standardised approach to be adopted by future investigations which control factors that specifically relate to investigations of time-of-day.

摘要

许多与无氧表现相关的功能测量值显示出日常变化。用于评估与昼夜效应相关的无氧表现的测试和方案的多样性以及缺乏标准化方法,阻碍了文献中的一致性。因此,本研究的目的是调查和系统回顾与无氧表现测量值的时间差异相关的证据。检索了 PubMed(MEDLINE)、Scopus、SPORTDiscus®(EBSCOhost)和 Web of Science 以及多个电子图书馆的全部内容。仅纳入了 2021 年 5 月前年龄≥18 岁的男性成年参与者进行的实验性研究。研究评估了全天至少两个时间点(早晨和晚上)之间的与无氧能力或无氧功率相关的测试被认为符合条件。初步搜索显示,在 145 篇文章中有 55 篇被认为符合条件,并随后被纳入。39 项研究评估了使用不同运动模式和测试方案的无氧功率,25 项研究评估了无氧能力。48 项研究发现其多项表现变量具有昼夜变化,晚上的数值高于早晨,而 7 项研究在评估的任何变量中均未发现昼夜差异。差异的幅度取决于使用的模式和运动方案。无氧功率的表现测量值发现,跳跃测试显示出 2.7%至 12.3%的差异,力量速度测试显示出 8%的差异,冲刺测试显示出 2.7%至 11.3%的差异,5 米多次穿梭跑测试显示出 3.7%至 13.1%的差异,所有这些测试均有利于晚上。无氧能力的表现测量值发现,Wingate 测试显示出 1.8%至 11.7%的差异,重复冲刺测试显示出 3.4%至 10.2%的差异。唯一没有显示昼夜差异的测试是基于跑步的无氧冲刺测试(RAST)。无氧表现的昼夜变化以前部分归因于下午核心体温和/或肌肉温度升高以及肌肉收缩特性改善,但最近的研究结果表明,方法学、动机/唤醒、习惯性训练时间和昼夜类型的差异可能提供了额外的解释。未来的研究需要采用严格的、标准化的方法,控制与昼夜研究特别相关的因素,这一点非常明确。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验