Suppr超能文献

基于近期出血征象的结直肠憩室出血早期和晚期复发的治疗策略:一项大型多中心研究。

Treatment strategies for reducing early and late recurrence of colonic diverticular bleeding based on stigmata of recent hemorrhage: a large multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1210-1222.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.023. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Treatment strategies for colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) based on stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) remain unstandardized, and no large studies have evaluated their effectiveness. We sought to identify the best strategy among combinations of SRH identification and endoscopic treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 5823 CDB patients who underwent colonoscopy at 49 hospitals throughout Japan (CODE-BLUE J-Study). Three strategies were compared: find SRH (definitive CDB) and treat endoscopically, find SRH (definitive CDB) and treat conservatively, and without finding SRH (presumptive CDB) treat conservatively. In conducting pairwise comparisons of outcomes in these groups, we used propensity score-matching analysis to balance baseline characteristics between the groups being compared.

RESULTS

Both early and late recurrent bleeding rates were significantly lower in patients with definitive CDB treated endoscopically than in those with presumptive CDB treated conservatively (<30 days, 19.6% vs 26.0% [P < .001]; <365 days, 33.7% vs 41.6% [P < .001], respectively). In patients with definitive CDB, the early recurrent bleeding rate was significantly lower in those treated endoscopically than in those treated conservatively (17.4% vs 26.7% [P = .038] for a single test of hypothesis; however, correction for multiple testing of data removed this significance). The late recurrent bleeding rate was also lower, but not significantly, in those treated endoscopically (32.0% vs 36.1%, P = .426). Definitive CDB treated endoscopically showed significantly lower early and late recurrent bleeding rates than when treated conservatively in cases of SRH with active bleeding, nonactive bleeding, and in the right-sided colon but not left-sided colon.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating definitive CDB endoscopically was most effective in reducing recurrent bleeding over the short and long term, compared with not treating definitive CDB or presumptive CDB. Physicians should endeavor to find and treat SRH for suspected CDB.

摘要

背景与目的

基于近期出血迹象(SRH)的结肠憩室出血(CDB)治疗策略尚未标准化,且尚无大型研究评估其疗效。我们旨在确定 SRH 识别与内镜治疗策略相结合的最佳策略。

方法

我们回顾性分析了在日本 49 家医院接受结肠镜检查的 5823 例 CDB 患者(CODE-BLUE J-Study)。比较了三种策略:发现 SRH(明确 CDB)并进行内镜治疗、发现 SRH(明确 CDB)并进行保守治疗、未发现 SRH(假定 CDB)并进行保守治疗。在对这些组的结果进行两两比较时,我们使用倾向评分匹配分析来平衡比较组之间的基线特征。

结果

与保守治疗相比,明确 CDB 内镜治疗组的早期和晚期复发性出血率均显著降低(<30 天,19.6%比 26.0%[P<0.001];<365 天,33.7%比 41.6%[P<0.001])。在明确 CDB 患者中,内镜治疗组的早期复发性出血率明显低于保守治疗组(17.4%比 26.7%[P=0.038],单次假设检验;然而,对数据进行多次检验校正后,这一差异无统计学意义)。内镜治疗组的晚期复发性出血率也较低,但无统计学意义(32.0%比 36.1%,P=0.426)。对于有活动性出血、非活动性出血和右侧结肠的 SRH,明确 CDB 内镜治疗的早期和晚期复发性出血率均明显低于保守治疗。

结论

与不治疗明确 CDB 或假定 CDB 相比,内镜治疗明确 CDB 可在短期内和长期内最有效地降低复发性出血率。医生应努力发现和治疗疑似 CDB 的 SRH。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验