Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital Kajigaya, Japan.
Intern Med. 2022;61(4):451-460. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.7702-21. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
Objective Clipping is a common technique for managing colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB), despite the lack of published evidence regarding its effectiveness. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of clipping for CDB in preventing early recurrent bleeding. Methods This dual-center retrospective study included 93 patients who underwent emergency hospitalization for bloody stool, diagnosed with definitive CDB, and treated with clipping or conservative treatment. The primary outcome was early recurrent bleeding. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the occurrence of early recurrent bleeding and clipping with adjustment for propensity scores. Secondary outcomes included death, transfusion, length of hospitalization, need for transcatheter arterial embolization or surgery, and adverse events. Results The patient characteristics were similar between the clipping (n=85) and conservative treatment (n=8) groups. The rate of early recurrent bleeding was significantly lower in the clipping group than in the conservative treatment group [23.5% (20 cases) vs. 75% (6 cases), p=0.005]. In the propensity score-adjusted logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio for early recurrent bleeding in the clipping group was 0.094 (95% confidence interval, 0.008-0.633, p=0.026). Secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. Stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) at the time of recurrent bleeding was identified in 79.2% of patients (19/24). In the clipping group, recurrent bleeding was observed in 62.5% of cases (10/16) from the same diverticulum. However, early recurrent bleeding tended to be less likely with direct clipping (p=0.072). Conclusion Clipping for definite CDB was more effective in preventing early recurrent bleeding than conservative treatment.
目的夹闭术是治疗结肠憩室出血(CDB)的常用技术,尽管缺乏关于其疗效的发表证据。我们旨在评估夹闭术治疗 CDB 预防早期复发性出血的效果。方法本项双中心回顾性研究纳入了 93 例因血便急诊住院、明确诊断为 CDB 并接受夹闭或保守治疗的患者。主要结局为早期复发性出血。采用逻辑回归分析评估早期复发性出血的发生与夹闭术之间的关联,并对倾向评分进行调整。次要结局包括死亡、输血、住院时间、需要经导管动脉栓塞或手术以及不良事件。结果夹闭组(n=85)和保守治疗组(n=8)患者的特征相似。夹闭组的早期复发性出血发生率明显低于保守治疗组[23.5%(20 例)比 75%(6 例),p=0.005]。在倾向评分调整的逻辑回归分析中,夹闭组早期复发性出血的优势比为 0.094(95%置信区间,0.008-0.633,p=0.026)。两组的次要结局无显著差异。在 24 例复发性出血患者中,79.2%(19/24)存在近期出血征象(SRH)。在夹闭组中,16 例中有 62.5%(10/16)的患者从同一憩室发生复发性出血。然而,直接夹闭术发生早期复发性出血的可能性较小(p=0.072)。结论与保守治疗相比,夹闭术治疗明确的 CDB 更能有效预防早期复发性出血。