• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using Medicare Enrollment Data to Identify Beneficiaries in Assisted Living.利用医疗保险登记数据来确定辅助生活中的受益人。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Mar;24(3):277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.062. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
2
Examining Black-White Disparities Among Medicare Beneficiaries in Assisted Living Settings in 2014.2014 年医疗保险受益人辅助生活环境中的黑-白差异研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jun;20(6):703-709. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.032. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
3
A Methodology to Identify a Cohort of Medicare Beneficiaries Residing in Large Assisted Living Facilities Using Administrative Data.一种利用行政数据识别居住在大型辅助生活设施中的医疗保险受益人的方法。
Med Care. 2018 Feb;56(2):e10-e15. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000659.
4
Identifying a National Cohort of Medicare Beneficiaries Residing in Assisted Living Settings: An Updated Method.确定居住在辅助生活设施中的医疗保险受益人的全国队列:一种更新方法。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Oct;24(10):1513-1517.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.04.023. Epub 2023 May 30.
5
Serious Mental Illness in Assisted Living Communities: Association with Nursing Home Placement.辅助生活社区中的严重精神疾病:与疗养院安置的关联。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 May;25(5):917-922. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.02.015. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
6
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
State Variability in the Prevalence and Healthcare Utilization of Assisted Living Residents with Dementia.痴呆症辅助生活居民的患病率和医疗保健利用的州内变异性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1504-1511. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16410. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
8
Effects of a nursing home telehealth program on spending and utilization for Medicare residents.养老院远程医疗计划对医疗保险居民的支出和利用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1191-1200. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13936. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
9
Assisted living or nursing home: Who is moving in?辅助生活或养老院:谁在搬进来?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Nov;71(11):3480-3488. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18503. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
10
Post-acute care transitions and outcomes among medicare beneficiaries in assisted living communities.辅助生活社区中医疗保险受益人的急性后期护理过渡与结局
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1429-1441. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17669. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Assisted living residents with dementia: Disparities in mental health services pre and during COVID-19.痴呆症辅助生活居民:在 COVID-19 之前和期间的心理健康服务差距。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jun;72(6):1760-1769. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18926. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
2
Serious Mental Illness in Assisted Living Communities: Association with Nursing Home Placement.辅助生活社区中的严重精神疾病:与疗养院安置的关联。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 May;25(5):917-922. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.02.015. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
3
Hospice providers serving assisted living residents: Association of higher volume with lower quality.为安养院居民提供临终关怀服务的机构:高服务量与低服务质量相关联。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Aug;72(8):2483-2490. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18883. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
4
Home time and state regulations among Medicare beneficiaries in assisted living communities.在辅助生活社区中,医疗保险受益人在家时间和州法规。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Mar;72(3):742-752. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18709. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
5
Assisted living or nursing home: Who is moving in?辅助生活或养老院:谁在搬进来?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Nov;71(11):3480-3488. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18503. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
6
Hospital Proximity and Emergency Department Use among Assisted Living Residents.养老社区居民与急诊室使用:医院临近性的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Sep;24(9):1349-1355.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
7
Online Customer Reviews of Assisted Living Communities: Association with Community, County, and State Factors.在线客户对辅助生活社区的评价:与社区、县和州因素的关联。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jun;24(6):841-845.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.007. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
8
End-of-Life Care Transitions in Assisted Living: Associations With State Staffing and Training Regulations.辅助生活中的临终关怀过渡:与州人员配备和培训法规的关联。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jun;24(6):827-832.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
9
Are online reviews of assisted living communities associated with patient-centered outcomes?在线评价辅助生活社区与以患者为中心的结局相关吗?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 May;71(5):1505-1514. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18192. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
10
Patient Safety Culture in Assisted Living: Staff Perceptions and Association with State Regulations.辅助生活中的患者安全文化:员工认知与州法规的关联。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Dec;23(12):1997-2002.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-acute care transitions and outcomes among medicare beneficiaries in assisted living communities.辅助生活社区中医疗保险受益人的急性后期护理过渡与结局
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1429-1441. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17669. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
2
The Imperative to Reimagine Assisted Living.重新构想辅助生活的必要性。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):225-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
3
Health Care Use and Outcomes in Assisted Living Communities: Race, Ethnicity, and Dual Eligibility.辅助生活社区的医疗保健使用和结果:种族、民族和双重资格。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Aug;79(4):500-510. doi: 10.1177/10775587211050189. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
4
Residential Care Community Resident Characteristics: United States, 2018.居住护理社区居民特征:美国,2018 年。
NCHS Data Brief. 2021 Sep(404):1-8.
5
State Medicaid Financing and Access to Large Assisted Living Settings for Medicare-Medicaid Dual-Eligibles.州医疗补助计划的筹资情况以及医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格获得者入住大型辅助生活设施的情况。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Feb;79(1):69-77. doi: 10.1177/1077558720987666. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
6
Connecting policy to licensed assisted living communities, introducing health services regulatory analysis.将政策与持牌辅助生活社区联系起来,引入健康服务监管分析。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun;56(3):540-549. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13616. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
7
Health Care Needs in Assisted Living: Survey Data May Underestimate Chronic Conditions.辅助生活中的医疗保健需求:调查数据可能低估慢性病情况。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):471-473. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.036. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
8
Variability and Potential Determinants of Assisted Living State Regulatory Stringency.辅助生活州监管严格性的可变性和潜在决定因素。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Aug;22(8):1714-1719.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.014. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
9
Characterizing Emergency Department Use in Assisted Living.描述辅助生活机构中急诊科的使用情况。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):913-917.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Changes in Long-Term Care Markets: Assisted Living Supply and the Prevalence of Low-Care Residents in Nursing Homes.长期护理市场的变化:辅助生活供给与疗养院中低护理需求居民的比例
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Aug;21(8):1161-1165.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

利用医疗保险登记数据来确定辅助生活中的受益人。

Using Medicare Enrollment Data to Identify Beneficiaries in Assisted Living.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Mar;24(3):277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.062. Epub 2022 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.062
PMID:35196482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9391528/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Develop an approach for identifying Medicare beneficiaries residing in US assisted living (AL) communities in calendar year 2018.

DESIGN

We used the following data sources: national directory of licensed ALs, file of US addresses and their associated 9-digit ZIP codes (ZIP+4), Medicare Enrollment Database (EDB), Master Beneficiary Summary File (MBSF), and the Minimum Data Set (MDS).

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 412,723 Medicare beneficiaries who lived in ZIP+4 codes associated with an AL were identified as residents. Approximately 28% of the 16,682 ALs in which these beneficiaries resided were smaller communities (<25 beds).

METHODS

For each AL, we identified ZIP+4 codes associated with its address. Using this ZIP+4 file, we searched through the Medicare EDB to identify beneficiaries who lived in each ZIP+4 code. The MBSF and MDS were used to exclude beneficiaries who died before 2018 and those whose AL and nursing home stays overlapped. We identified 3 cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries: (1) residents of a specific AL (one AL address per ZIP+4), (2) most likely AL residents, and (3) not likely AL residents. Comparisons across these cohorts were used to examine construct validity of our approach. Additional comparisons were made to AL residents based on the National Survey of Long-Term Care Providers (NSLTCP) and to fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare community-dwelling and long-stay nursing home residents.

RESULTS

The cohorts of beneficiaries identified as AL residents exhibited good construct validity. AL residents also showed similarity in demographic characteristics to the 2018 sample from the NSLTCP, and as expected were different from FFS community and nursing home beneficiaries.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

We developed a methodology for identifying Medicare beneficiaries who reside in ALs. As this residential setting continues to grow, future studies will need effective approaches for identifying AL residents in order to evaluate the quality of care they receive.

摘要

目的

制定一种方法,以识别 2018 年居住在美国辅助生活(AL)社区的医疗保险受益人。

设计

我们使用了以下数据源:国家许可的 AL 目录、美国地址及其相关的 9 位邮政编码(ZIP+4)文件、医疗保险登记数据库(EDB)、主受益人摘要文件(MBSF)和最小数据集(MDS)。

设置和参与者

确定居住在与 AL 相关的 ZIP+4 代码中的 412,723 名医疗保险受益人作为居民。这些受益人居住的 16,682 个 AL 中,约有 28%是较小的社区(<25 张床)。

方法

对于每个 AL,我们确定与其地址相关的 ZIP+4 代码。使用此 ZIP+4 文件,我们在医疗保险 EDB 中搜索居住在每个 ZIP+4 代码中的受益人。MBSF 和 MDS 用于排除 2018 年前死亡的受益人以及 AL 和疗养院入住重叠的受益人。我们确定了 3 组医疗保险受益人:(1)特定 AL 的居民(每个 ZIP+4 有一个 AL 地址),(2)最有可能的 AL 居民,和(3)不太可能的 AL 居民。对这些队列进行比较,以检验我们方法的构建效度。还与基于全国长期护理提供者调查(NSLTCP)的 AL 居民以及按服务收费(FFS)医疗保险社区居住和长期护理院居民进行了比较。

结果

被确定为 AL 居民的受益人群组表现出良好的构建效度。AL 居民在人口统计学特征上也与 NSLTCP 2018 年样本相似,并且与 FFS 社区和疗养院受益人预期不同。

结论和意义

我们开发了一种识别居住在 AL 中的医疗保险受益人的方法。随着这种居住环境的不断发展,未来的研究将需要有效的方法来识别 AL 居民,以便评估他们所接受的护理质量。