• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining Psychological and Knowledge Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Appalachian Kentucky.探讨肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚农村地区结直肠癌筛查的心理和知识障碍。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Feb;38(1):325-332. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02120-0. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
2
Relationship between colorectal cancer screening adherence and knowledge among vulnerable rural residents of Appalachian Kentucky.肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚农村脆弱居民的结直肠癌筛查依从性与知识之间的关系。
Cancer Nurs. 2012 Jul-Aug;35(4):288-94. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31822e7859.
3
Physician and staff perceptions of barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区医生及工作人员对结直肠癌筛查障碍的看法。
Cancer Control. 2007 Apr;14(2):167-75. doi: 10.1177/107327480701400210.
4
Feasibility and efficacy of a novel audiovisual tool to increase colorectal cancer screening among rural Appalachian Kentucky adults.一种新型视听工具在增加肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚农村成年人结直肠癌筛查中的可行性和效果。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 11;12:1415607. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415607. eCollection 2024.
5
Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia: protocol for a group randomized, delayed intervention trial.通过实施科学(ACCSIS)在阿巴拉契亚加速结直肠癌筛查和随访:一项群组随机、延迟干预试验的方案。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Sep 28;13(10):748-756. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad017.
6
Academic detailing to increase colorectal cancer screening by primary care practices in Appalachian Pennsylvania.学术细化以增加宾夕法尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区初级保健实践中的结直肠癌筛查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 23;11:112. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-112.
7
Colorectal cancer prevention: Perspectives of key players from social networks in a low-income rural US region.结直肠癌预防:美国低收入农村地区社交网络中关键参与者的观点
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Feb 22;11:30396. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.30396. eCollection 2016.
8
Identifying Communication Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence among Appalachian Kentuckians.识别阿巴拉契亚肯塔基人在结直肠癌筛查依从性方面的沟通障碍。
Health Commun. 2018 Oct;33(10):1284-1292. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1351274. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
9
Effectiveness of a primary care practice intervention for increasing colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州初级保健实践干预措施提高结直肠癌筛查效果的研究。
Prev Med. 2014 Jan;58:70-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
10
Building Cancer Prevention and Control Research Capacity in Rural Appalachian Kentucky Primary Care Clinics During COVID-19: Development and Adaptation of a Multilevel Colorectal Cancer Screening Project.在 COVID-19 期间,于肯塔基州农村阿巴拉契亚地区初级保健诊所建立癌症预防与控制研究能力:多层次结直肠癌筛查项目的制定与调整。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1407-1413. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01972-w. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Educational interventions to improve bowel cancer awareness and screening in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries: A scoping review.提高经济合作与发展组织国家结肠癌认知度和筛查率的教育干预措施:一项范围综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Feb 13;39:102653. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102653. eCollection 2024 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer-Related Beliefs and Perceptions in Appalachia: Findings from 3 States.阿巴拉契亚地区的癌症相关信念和认知:来自 3 个州的调查结果。
J Rural Health. 2019 Mar;35(2):176-188. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12359. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
2
What do we know about community-based health worker programs? A systematic review of existing reviews on community health workers.我们对基于社区的卫生工作者项目了解多少?对社区卫生工作者现有综述的系统评价。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Aug 16;16(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0304-x.
3
A Social-Ecological Review of Cancer Disparities in Kentucky.肯塔基州癌症差异的社会生态综述。
South Med J. 2018 Apr;111(4):213-219. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000794.
4
Use of Community Health Workers and Patient Navigators to Improve Cancer Outcomes Among Patients Served by Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Systematic Literature Review.利用社区卫生工作者和患者导航员改善联邦合格医疗中心服务患者的癌症治疗效果:一项系统文献综述
Health Equity. 2017 May 1;1(1):61-76. doi: 10.1089/heq.2017.0001. eCollection 2017.
5
Performance of community health workers: situating their intermediary position within complex adaptive health systems.社区卫生工作者的绩效:在复杂适应型卫生系统中定位其中介地位。
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Sep 2;15(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12960-017-0234-z.
6
Cancer Disparities in Rural Appalachia: Incidence, Early Detection, and Survivorship.农村阿巴拉契亚地区的癌症差异:发病率、早期发现和生存。
J Rural Health. 2017 Sep;33(4):375-381. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12213. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
7
A Media and Clinic Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Ohio Appalachia.一项旨在提高俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚地区结直肠癌筛查率的媒体与临床干预措施。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:943152. doi: 10.1155/2015/943152. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
8
Challenges of Rural Cancer Care in the United States.美国农村癌症护理面临的挑战。
Oncology (Williston Park). 2015 Sep;29(9):633-40.
9
Socio-psychological factors in the Expanded Health Belief Model and subsequent colorectal cancer screening.扩展健康信念模型中的社会心理因素与后续的结直肠癌筛查
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jul;98(7):901-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
10
Association of health literacy with adherence to screening mammography guidelines.健康素养与乳腺钼靶筛查指南依从性的关联。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;125(4):852-859. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000708.

探讨肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚农村地区结直肠癌筛查的心理和知识障碍。

Examining Psychological and Knowledge Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Appalachian Kentucky.

机构信息

University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA.

The Travelers Companies, Inc., New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2023 Feb;38(1):325-332. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02120-0. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-021-02120-0
PMID:34984660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10433712/
Abstract

While recent rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have improved in Appalachian Kentucky due to public health efforts, they remain lower compared to both KY as a whole, and the USA. Suboptimal screening rates represent a missed opportunity to engage in early detection and prevention. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact that lack of knowledge has on psychological barriers (e.g., fear and embarrassment) to CRC screening as well as the potential effect of a psychosocial intervention to reduce these barriers. Participants were recruited through faith-based organizations and other community sites. After randomizing participants to either an early or delayed group, a faith-based group education and motivational interviewing intervention was administered. Existing and pilot tested instruments were used to assess knowledge and potential psychological barriers. Data were analyzed using paired t tests and linear regression. We hypothesized that (1) psychological barriers are associated with inadequate knowledge and (2) the intervention, by improving knowledge, could reduce these barriers and increase screening rates. There was a small but significant reduction in psychological barriers (-0.11, p value = 0.015) and moderate increases in CRC knowledge scores (+0.17, p value = 0.06). There was no evidence that the intervention affected these measures (+0.10, p value = 0.58). The relationship between lower barrier scores and increased knowledge was significant at follow up (-0.05, 95% CI (-0.09, -0.00)). An increase in CRC knowledge was correlated with a small but significant decrease in psychological barriers, although there was no evidence that these changes were associated with one another. Future cognitive-based interventions may be effective in increasing CRC knowledge and reducing barriers, but new intervention approaches should be considered.

摘要

尽管由于公共卫生努力,阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率最近有所提高,但与整个肯塔基州和美国相比,这些比率仍然较低。筛查率不理想意味着错过了参与早期发现和预防的机会。本研究的目的是确定缺乏知识对 CRC 筛查的心理障碍(如恐惧和尴尬)的影响,以及减少这些障碍的心理社会干预的潜在效果。参与者是通过信仰组织和其他社区场所招募的。在将参与者随机分配到早期或延迟组后,进行了基于信仰的团体教育和动机访谈干预。使用现有的和试点测试的工具来评估知识和潜在的心理障碍。使用配对 t 检验和线性回归进行数据分析。我们假设:(1)心理障碍与知识不足有关,(2)通过提高知识,干预可以减少这些障碍并提高筛查率。心理障碍有较小但显著的降低(-0.11,p 值=0.015),CRC 知识得分有适度增加(+0.17,p 值=0.06)。没有证据表明干预会影响这些措施(+0.10,p 值=0.58)。在随访时,较低的障碍评分与增加的知识之间存在显著关系(-0.05,95%CI(-0.09,-0.00))。CRC 知识的增加与心理障碍的微小但显著减少相关,尽管没有证据表明这些变化彼此相关。未来基于认知的干预措施可能会有效提高 CRC 知识和减少障碍,但应考虑新的干预方法。