Suppr超能文献

扩展健康信念模型中的社会心理因素与后续的结直肠癌筛查

Socio-psychological factors in the Expanded Health Belief Model and subsequent colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Sohler Nancy L, Jerant Anthony, Franks Peter

机构信息

Community Health and Social Medicine, Sophie Davis School of Biomedical Education, City College of New York, New York, USA.

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jul;98(7):901-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

CRC screening interventions tailored to the Expanded Health Belief Model (EHBM) socio-psychological factors have been developed, but the contributions of individual factors to screening outcomes are unclear.

METHODS

In observational analyses of data from a randomized intervention trial, we examined the independent associations of five EHBM factors - CRC screening knowledge, self-efficacy, stage of readiness, barriers, and discussion with a provider - with objectively measured CRC screening after one year.

RESULTS

When all five factors were added simultaneously to a base model including other patient and visit characteristics, three of the factors were associated with CRC screening: self-efficacy (OR=1.32, p=0.001), readiness (OR=2.72, p<0.001), and discussion of screening with a provider (OR=1.59, p=0.009). Knowledge and barriers were not independently associated with screening. Adding the five socio-psychological factors to the base model improved prediction of CRC screening (area under the curve) by 7.7%.

CONCLUSION

Patient CRC screening self-efficacy, readiness, and discussion with a provider each independently predicted subsequent screening.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Self-efficacy and readiness measures might be helpful in parsimoniously predicting which patients are most likely to engage in CRC screening. The importance of screening discussion with a provider suggests the potential value of augmenting patient-focused EHBM-tailored interventions with provider-focused elements.

摘要

目的

已开发出针对扩展健康信念模型(EHBM)社会心理因素的结直肠癌筛查干预措施,但个体因素对筛查结果的贡献尚不清楚。

方法

在一项随机干预试验数据的观察性分析中,我们研究了五个EHBM因素——结直肠癌筛查知识、自我效能感、准备阶段、障碍以及与医疗服务提供者的讨论——与一年后客观测量的结直肠癌筛查之间的独立关联。

结果

当将所有五个因素同时添加到包含其他患者和就诊特征的基础模型中时,其中三个因素与结直肠癌筛查相关:自我效能感(OR = 1.32,p = 0.001)、准备阶段(OR = 2.72,p < 0.001)以及与医疗服务提供者讨论筛查(OR = 1.59,p = 0.009)。知识和障碍与筛查无独立关联。将这五个社会心理因素添加到基础模型中,可使结直肠癌筛查预测(曲线下面积)提高7.7%。

结论

患者的结直肠癌筛查自我效能感、准备阶段以及与医疗服务提供者的讨论各自独立预测后续筛查。

实践意义

自我效能感和准备阶段测量可能有助于简洁地预测哪些患者最有可能进行结直肠癌筛查。与医疗服务提供者讨论筛查的重要性表明,在以患者为中心的EHBM定制干预措施中增加以医疗服务提供者为中心的要素具有潜在价值。

相似文献

1
Socio-psychological factors in the Expanded Health Belief Model and subsequent colorectal cancer screening.
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jul;98(7):901-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
2
Physician counseling for colorectal cancer screening: impact on patient attitudes, beliefs, and behavior.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):673-81. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.110001.
4
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in mammography-adherent older women.
J Behav Med. 2003 Dec;26(6):553-76. doi: 10.1023/a:1026253802962.
7
Changes in the choice of colorectal cancer screening tests in primary care settings from 7,845 prospectively collected surveys.
Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Sep;23(9):1541-8. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0031-x. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
8
Providers role in colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.
Am J Health Behav. 2014 Mar;38(2):234-44. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.38.2.9.
9
Knowledge and beliefs of Jordanians toward colorectal cancer screening.
Cancer Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(2):141-8. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181b823f3.
10
Rural-Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Nebraska.
J Community Health. 2015 Dec;40(6):1065-74. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0032-2.

引用本文的文献

1
4
Assessment of the Psychosocial Impact of Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in High-Risk Individuals.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 23;16(1):86. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010086.
7
Gynaecological Cancers in India: The Less Heard Perspectives of Healthcare Providers.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;20(3):2221. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032221.
8
Validity of a questionnaire on self-efficacy for Pap test adherence screening.
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 26;12:979799. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.979799. eCollection 2022.
9
Examining Psychological and Knowledge Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Appalachian Kentucky.
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Feb;38(1):325-332. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02120-0. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
Mediators of screening uptake in a colorectal cancer screening intervention among Hispanics.
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 5;22(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09092-w.

本文引用的文献

2
Promoting colorectal cancer screening discussion: a randomized controlled trial.
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.032.
3
A randomized comparison of print and web communication on colorectal cancer screening.
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 28;173(2):122-9. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.1017.
5
Expressions of machismo in colorectal cancer screening among New Mexico Hispanic subpopulations.
Qual Health Res. 2012 Apr;22(4):546-59. doi: 10.1177/1049732311424509. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
8
A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior.
Health Commun. 2010 Dec;25(8):661-9. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2010.521906.
9
Behavioral mediators of colorectal cancer screening in a randomized controlled intervention trial.
Prev Med. 2011 Feb;52(2):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.11.007. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
10
A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change.
Prev Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;51(3-4):214-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jun 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验