Suppr超能文献

儿童中 SARS 抗体检测:IgG 测量的口腔液检测方法的开发。

SARS Antibody Testing in Children: Development of Oral Fluid Assays for IgG Measurements.

机构信息

Virus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.

Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0078621. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00786-21. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

Abstract

Seroepidemiological studies to monitor antibody kinetics are important for assessing the extent and spread of SARS-CoV-2 in a population. Noninvasive sampling methods are advantageous for reducing the need for venipuncture, which may be a barrier to investigations, particularly in pediatric populations. Oral fluids are obtained by gingiva-crevicular sampling from children and adults and are very well accepted. Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) based on these samples have acceptable sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional serum-based antibody EIAs and are suitable for population-based surveillance. We describe the development and evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 IgG EIAs using SARS-CoV-2 viral nucleoprotein (NP) and spike (S) proteins in IgG isotype capture format and an indirect receptor-binding-domain (RBD) IgG EIA, intended for use in children as a primary endpoint. All three assays were assessed using a panel of 1,999 paired serum and oral fluids from children and adults participating in school SARS-CoV-2 surveillance studies during and after the first and second pandemic wave in the United Kingdom. The anti-NP IgG capture assay was the best candidate, with an overall sensitivity of 75% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71 to 79%) and specificity of 99% (95% CI: 78 to 99%) compared with paired serum antibodies. Sensitivity observed in children (80%, 95% CI: 71 to 88%) was higher than that in adults (67%, CI: 60% to 74%). Oral fluid assays (OF) using spike protein and RBD antigens were also 99% specific and achieved reasonable but lower sensitivity in the target population (78%, 95% CI [68% to 86%] and 53%, 95% CI [43% to 64%], respectively). We report on the first large-scale assessment of the suitability of oral fluids for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibody obtained from healthy children attending school. The sample type (gingiva-crevicular fluid, which is a transudate of blood but is not saliva) can be self collected. Although detection of antibodies in oral fluids is less sensitive than that in blood, our study suggests an optimal format for operational use. The laboratory methods we have developed can reliably measure antibodies in children, who are able to take their own samples. Our findings are of immediate practical relevance for use in large-scale seroprevalence studies designed to measure exposure to infection, as they typically require venipuncture. Overall, our data indicate that OF assays based on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are a tool suitable for population-based seroepidemiology studies in children and highly acceptable in children and adults, as venipuncture is no longer necessary.

摘要

血清流行病学研究对于监测抗体动力学,评估 SARS-CoV-2 在人群中的传播程度和范围非常重要。非侵入性采样方法有利于减少对静脉穿刺的需求,这可能是研究的一个障碍,尤其是在儿科人群中。从儿童和成人的龈沟液中采集口腔液,且该方法非常容易被接受。基于这些样本的酶联免疫吸附试验(EIAs)与传统的基于血清的抗体 EIAs 相比具有可接受的敏感性和特异性,适用于基于人群的监测。我们描述了使用 SARS-CoV-2 病毒核衣壳蛋白(NP)和刺突(S)蛋白的 SARS-CoV-2 IgG EIAs 的开发和评估,该方法采用 IgG 同种型捕获格式和间接受体结合域(RBD)IgG EIA,旨在作为儿童的主要终点。所有三种检测方法均使用来自参加英国第一波和第二波大流行期间和之后 SARS-CoV-2 监测研究的儿童和成人的 1999 对血清和口腔液进行了评估。抗 NP IgG 捕获检测是最佳候选方法,与配对血清抗体相比,其总体敏感性为 75%(95%置信区间[CI]:71%至 79%),特异性为 99%(95%CI:78%至 99%)。在儿童中观察到的敏感性(80%,95%CI:71%至 88%)高于成人(67%,CI:60%至 74%)。使用刺突蛋白和 RBD 抗原的口腔液检测也具有 99%的特异性,在目标人群中达到了合理但较低的敏感性(分别为 78%[95%CI:68%至 86%]和 53%[95%CI:43%至 64%])。我们报告了第一个大规模评估口腔液用于检测从健康儿童中获得的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的适用性的研究。样本类型(龈沟液,是血液的渗出液,但不是唾液)可以自我采集。尽管口腔液中抗体的检测敏感性低于血液,但我们的研究表明了一种用于实际操作的最佳方法。我们开发的实验室方法可以可靠地测量儿童的抗体,且儿童能够自行采集样本。我们的研究结果对于设计用于测量感染暴露的大规模血清流行率研究具有直接的实际意义,因为这些研究通常需要静脉穿刺。总的来说,我们的数据表明,基于 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测的口腔液检测是一种适合儿童的基于人群的血清流行病学研究的工具,且非常容易被儿童和成人接受,因为不再需要静脉穿刺。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9403/8729769/3a38b3b1f9eb/spectrum.00786-21-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验