School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Thurgauerstrasse 130, 8152, Glattpark-Opfikon (Zurich), Switzerland.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Dec;35(Suppl 1):11-19. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0544-y.
Recommendations and guidelines for the collection, generation, source and usage of utility data for health technology assessment (HTA) vary across different countries, with no international consensus. Many international agencies generate their own guidelines providing details on their preferred methods for HTA submissions, and there is variability in both what they recommend and the clarity and amount of detail provided in their guidelines. This article provides an overview of international regulations and recommendations for utility data in HTA for a selection of key HTA countries: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain (Catalonia), Sweden and the UK (England/Wales and Scotland). International guidelines are typically clear and detailed for the selection of countries assessed regarding the source description of health states (e.g. generic preference-based measure) and who should provide preference weights for these health states (e.g. general population for own country). Many guidelines specify the use of off-the-shelf generic preference-based measures, and some further specify a measure, such as EQ-5D. However, international guidelines are either unclear or lack detailed guidance regarding the collection (e.g. patients report own health), source (e.g. clinical trial) and usage (e.g. adjusting for comorbidities) of utility values. It is argued that there is a need for transparent and detailed international guidelines on utility data recommendations to provide decision makers with the best possible evidence. Where this is not possible it is recommended that best practice should be used to inform the collection, source and usage of utility values in HTA.
对于健康技术评估(HTA)实用数据的收集、生成、来源和使用,不同国家的推荐和指南存在差异,尚未达成国际共识。许多国际机构制定了自己的指南,详细说明了他们对 HTA 提交的首选方法,而且他们推荐的方法以及指南的清晰度和详细程度存在差异。本文概述了一些关键 HTA 国家(澳大利亚、加拿大、法国、德国、荷兰、西班牙(加泰罗尼亚)、瑞典和英国(英格兰/威尔士和苏格兰))的 HTA 中实用数据的国际法规和建议。国际指南通常对评估国家的来源描述(例如通用偏好测量)和谁应为这些健康状况提供偏好权重(例如本国的一般人群)的选择明确而详细。许多指南都规定了使用现成的通用偏好测量方法,一些指南还进一步规定了某种措施,例如 EQ-5D。然而,国际指南在实用值的收集(例如患者报告自己的健康状况)、来源(例如临床试验)和使用(例如调整合并症)方面要么不够明确,要么缺乏详细的指导。有人认为,有必要制定透明和详细的国际实用数据推荐指南,为决策者提供尽可能好的证据。在无法做到这一点的情况下,建议采用最佳实践来告知 HTA 中实用值的收集、来源和使用。