Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter Penryn Campus, Penryn, UK.
Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12353-9.
Individual behavioural decisions are responses to a person's perceived social norms that could be shaped by both their physical and social environment. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, these environments correspond to epidemiological risk from contacts and the social construction of risk by communication within networks of friends. Understanding the circumstances under which the influence of these different social networks can promote the acceptance of non-pharmaceutical interventions and consequently the adoption of protective behaviours is critical for guiding useful, practical public health messaging.
We explore how information from both physical contact and social communication layers of a multiplex network can contribute to flattening the epidemic curve in a community. Connections in the physical contact layer represent opportunities for transmission, while connections in the communication layer represent social interactions through which individuals may gain information, e.g. messaging friends.
We show that maintaining focus on awareness of risk among each individual's physical contacts promotes the greatest reduction in disease spread, but only when an individual is aware of the symptoms of a non-trivial proportion of their physical contacts (~ ≥ 20%). Information from the social communication layer without was less useful when these connections matched less well with physical contacts and contributed little in combination with accurate information from physical contacts.
We conclude that maintaining social focus on local outbreak status will allow individuals to structure their perceived social norms appropriately and respond more rapidly when risk increases. Finding ways to relay accurate local information from trusted community leaders could improve mitigation even where more intrusive/costly strategies, such as contact-tracing, are not possible.
个人行为决策是对个人感知到的社会规范的反应,这些规范可能受到其物理和社会环境的影响。在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,这些环境对应于与接触相关的流行病学风险,以及通过朋友网络中的沟通对风险的社会构建。了解这些不同社会网络的影响在何种情况下可以促进非药物干预措施的接受,并因此促进保护行为的采用,对于指导有用的、实际的公共卫生信息传递至关重要。
我们探讨了多元网络的物理接触和社会沟通层中的信息如何有助于在社区中减缓疫情曲线。物理接触层中的连接代表着传播的机会,而沟通层中的连接则代表着个人可以通过社交互动获得信息的机会,例如向朋友发送消息。
我们表明,关注每个个体物理接触者的风险意识最能减少疾病传播,但只有当个体意识到其物理接触者中有相当一部分 (~≥20%)有非典型症状时才有效。如果这些连接与物理接触者的匹配度较低,并且与物理接触者的准确信息结合起来作用不大,则来自社会沟通层的信息作用就不大。
我们得出结论,保持对当地疫情状况的社会关注将使个体能够适当地构建其感知到的社会规范,并在风险增加时更快地做出反应。寻找从值得信赖的社区领导人那里传递准确的本地信息的方法,即使在无法采取更具侵入性/成本更高的策略(例如接触者追踪)的情况下,也可以改善缓解措施。