• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平衡疫情数据报告的及时性与提高检测概率。

Balancing timeliness of reporting with increasing testing probability for epidemic data.

作者信息

Pritchard Alexander J, Silk Matthew J, Carrignon Simon, Bentley R Alexander, Fefferman Nina H

机构信息

NIMBioS, National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.

Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter Penryn Campus, UK.

出版信息

Infect Dis Model. 2022 Apr 6;7(2):106-116. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2022.04.001. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.idm.2022.04.001
PMID:35509716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9046562/
Abstract

Reporting of epidemiological data requires coordinated action by numerous agencies, across a multitude of logistical steps. Using collated and reported information to inform direct interventions can be challenging due to associated delays. Mitigation can, however, occur indirectly through the public generation of concern, which facilitates adherence to protective behaviors. We utilized a coupled-dynamic multiplex network model with a communication- and disease-layer to examine how variation in reporting delay and testing probability are likely to impact adherence to protective behaviors, such as reducing physical contact. Individual concern mediated adherence and was informed by new- or active-case reporting, at the population- or community-level. Individuals received information from the communication layer: direct connections that were sick or adherent to protective behaviors increased their concern, but absence of illness eroded concern. Models revealed that the relative benefit of timely reporting and a high probability of testing was contingent on how much information was already obtained. With low rates of testing, increasing testing probability was of greater mitigating value. With high rates of testing, maximizing timeliness was of greater value. Population-level reporting provided advanced warning of disease risk from nearby communities; but we explore the relative costs and benefits of delays due to scale against the assumption that people may prioritize community-level information. Our findings emphasize the interaction of testing accuracy and reporting timeliness for the indirect mitigation of disease in a complex social system.

摘要

报告流行病学数据需要众多机构在众多后勤步骤上采取协调行动。由于相关延迟,利用整理和报告的信息为直接干预提供依据可能具有挑战性。然而,缓解可以通过公众产生的关注间接发生,这有助于人们遵守保护行为。我们使用了一个具有通信层和疾病层的耦合动态多重网络模型,来研究报告延迟和检测概率的变化如何可能影响对保护行为的遵守,例如减少身体接触。个人关注介导了遵守行为,并受到人群或社区层面新病例或现患病例报告的影响。个体从通信层获取信息:生病或遵守保护行为的直接联系会增加他们的关注,但没有疾病则会削弱关注。模型显示,及时报告和高检测概率的相对益处取决于已经获得的信息量。在检测率较低时,提高检测概率具有更大的缓解价值。在检测率较高时,最大限度地提高及时性具有更大的价值。人群层面的报告提供了附近社区疾病风险的预警;但我们探讨了由于规模导致的延迟的相对成本和收益,与人们可能优先考虑社区层面信息的假设相对照。我们的研究结果强调了在复杂社会系统中检测准确性和报告及时性对疾病间接缓解的相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/103e/9046562/5afd111b77d8/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/103e/9046562/6064b35703bc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/103e/9046562/78a543f9fd48/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/103e/9046562/ede3a032ba56/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/103e/9046562/2d5ce9023868/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/103e/9046562/5afd111b77d8/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/103e/9046562/6064b35703bc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/103e/9046562/78a543f9fd48/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/103e/9046562/ede3a032ba56/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/103e/9046562/2d5ce9023868/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/103e/9046562/5afd111b77d8/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Balancing timeliness of reporting with increasing testing probability for epidemic data.平衡疫情数据报告的及时性与提高检测概率。
Infect Dis Model. 2022 Apr 6;7(2):106-116. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2022.04.001. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
How reported outbreak data can shape individual behavior in a social world.报告的暴发数据如何影响社交世界中个体行为
J Public Health Policy. 2022 Sep;43(3):360-378. doi: 10.1057/s41271-022-00357-7. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Tuberculosis结核病
5
Notifiable condition reporting practices: implications for public health agency participation in a health information exchange.应报告疾病的报告实践:对公共卫生机构参与健康信息交换的影响
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 11;17(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4156-4.
6
Evaluating the timeliness of reporting in a First Nations communicable diseases program.评估原住民传染病项目中报告的及时性。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2017 Jun 1;43(6):133-137. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v43i06a03.
7
Timeliness and completeness of laboratory-based surveillance of COVID-19 cases in England.英格兰基于实验室的 COVID-19 病例监测的及时性和完整性。
Public Health. 2021 May;194:163-166. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
8
Integrated disease surveillance and response implementation in Liberia, findings from a data quality audit, 2017.2017年利比里亚综合疾病监测与应对实施情况:数据质量审计结果
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 May 31;33(Suppl 2):10. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2019.33.2.17608. eCollection 2019.
9
Completeness and timeliness of notifiable disease reporting: a comparison of laboratory and provider reports submitted to a large county health department.法定传染病报告的完整性和及时性:提交给某大型县卫生部门的实验室报告与医疗机构报告的比较
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 23;17(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0491-8.
10
Utility and potential of rapid epidemic intelligence from internet-based sources.基于互联网的快速疫情情报的效用和潜力。
Int J Infect Dis. 2017 Oct;63:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.07.020. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Large-scale implementation of rapid antigen testing system for COVID-19 in workplaces.在工作场所大规模实施新冠病毒快速抗原检测系统。
Sci Adv. 2022 Feb 25;8(8):eabm3608. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm3608.
2
Observations and conversations: how communities learn about infection risk can impact the success of non-pharmaceutical interventions against epidemics.观察与对话:社区对感染风险的认知如何影响针对传染病的非药物干预措施的成效。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12353-9.
3
Improving pandemic mitigation policies across communities through coupled dynamics of risk perception and infection.
通过风险感知和感染的耦合动力学来改善跨社区的大流行缓解政策。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 28;288(1955):20210834. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0834. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
4
Causal graph analysis of COVID-19 observational data in German districts reveals effects of determining factors on reported case numbers.德国地区 COVID-19 观测数据的因果图分析揭示了决定因素对报告病例数的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0237277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237277. eCollection 2021.
5
COVID-19 Real-time Information System for Preparedness and Epidemic Response (CRISPER).COVID-19 疫情应对与准备实时信息系统(CRISPER)
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214(8):386-386.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51019. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
6
Shifting Coronavirus Disease 2019 Testing Policy and Research to Include the Full Translation Pipeline.将2019年冠状病毒病检测政策与研究转变为纳入完整翻译流程。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 5;8(2):ofaa649. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa649. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
The challenges of containing SARS-CoV-2 via test-trace-and-isolate.通过检测-追踪-隔离来控制 SARS-CoV-2 面临的挑战。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 15;12(1):378. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20699-8.
8
The impact of false positive COVID-19 results in an area of low prevalence.低流行地区 COVID-19 假阳性结果的影响。
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Jan;21(1):e54-e56. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0839. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
9
Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.新冠病毒筛查时,检测敏感性次于检测频率和周转时间。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd5393. Print 2021 Jan.
10
Changes in risk perception and self-reported protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.美国新冠疫情大流行第一周期间风险认知及自我报告的防护行为变化
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 16;7(9):200742. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200742. eCollection 2020 Sep.