Office of Continuing Professional Development, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.
McMaster Education Research, Innovation, and Theory, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.
F1000Res. 2021 Oct 15;10:1048. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.73439.2. eCollection 2021.
Social media is changing the modern academic landscape; this study sought to explore how organizational structures support or inhibit the harnessing of social media use in academic contexts and knowledge translation. A qualitative study was conducted using framework analysis based on the Bolman and Deal's Four-Frame Model-structural, human resources, political and symbolic. The research team used the snowball sampling technique to recruit participants following the completion of each participant's semi-structured interview. A member check was completed to ensure rigour. 16 social media educators and experts from several countries participated in the study. Study findings showed that within the Structural Frame, participants' organizations were reported to have with diverse hierarchical structures, ranging hospital-based (strict), education institutional-based and online only groups (malleable). The Human Resources Frame revealed that most participants' social media organizations operated on unpaid volunteer staff. The training of these staff was primarily via role-modeling and mentorship. Regarding the Political Frame, social media helped participants accumulate scholarly currency and influence within their field of practice. The Symbolic Frame showed a wide range of traditional to non-traditional organizational supports, which interacted with both intrinsic to extrinsic motivation. Bolman and Deal's Four-Frame Model framework may serve as an effective guideline for academic leaders who wish to strategically implement or enhance social media use into their organizations. The key insights that we have gained from our participants are how new emerging forms of scholarly pursuits can be more effectively enabled or hindered by the attributes of the organization within which these are occurring.
社交媒体正在改变现代学术格局;本研究旨在探讨组织结构如何支持或抑制在学术背景和知识转化中利用社交媒体。本研究采用基于 Bolman 和 Deal 的四框架模型(结构、人力资源、政治和象征)的框架分析进行了定性研究。研究团队在完成每位参与者的半结构化访谈后,使用滚雪球抽样技术招募参与者。为确保严谨性,完成了成员检查。来自多个国家的 16 名社交媒体教育者和专家参加了这项研究。研究结果表明,在结构框架内,据报道,参与者所在的组织具有不同的层次结构,范围从基于医院的(严格)、基于教育机构的到仅在线的组织。人力资源框架显示,大多数参与者的社交媒体组织依靠无偿的志愿者工作人员运作。这些员工的培训主要通过榜样和指导。关于政治框架,社交媒体帮助参与者在他们的实践领域积累学术货币和影响力。象征框架显示了广泛的传统和非传统的组织支持,这些支持与内在和外在动机相互作用。Bolman 和 Deal 的四框架模型框架可以作为学术领导者的有效指导方针,他们希望在组织中战略性地实施或增强对社交媒体的使用。我们从参与者那里获得的主要见解是,新出现的学术追求形式如何通过这些学术追求发生的组织属性更有效地被促进或阻碍。