Faculty of Medicine, School of Speech-Language and Audiology, University of Montreal, Succursale Centre-Ville, 7077 Avenue du Parc, bureau 3001-42, C.P. 6128, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Institut Universitaire sur la Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Montréal (IURDPM), Pavillon Laurier, CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-L'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Feb;240(2):601-610. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06302-6. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
Gaze stabilization performance has been shown to be influenced differently when the head is either passively or actively moved in normal healthy participants. However, for a visual fixation suppression task, it remains unknown if the pattern of coordinated head and eye movement is influenced differently by passive or active head movements. We used a suppression head impulse paradigm (SHIMP), where the subject's goal was to maintain gaze stabilized on a visual target that moved with the head during rapid impulsive head movements, to evaluate gaze fixation performance in three conditions: (1) passive-unpredictable where the examiner applied impulsive head yaw rotations with random timing and direction, (2) passive-predictable where the direction of head rotation was announced and then the examiner repeatedly applied impulses in the same direction, and (3) active where the test subject self-generated their head movements. Thirteen young healthy adults performed all three conditions to assess the percentage of early saccades that initiated the gaze shift toward the final visual target position and the latency of first saccades. Early saccades were defined as those occurring within the duration of the head impulse. Results showed that active head impulses generated the greatest percentage of early saccades, followed by predictable and unpredictable. Among the two passive conditions, predictability shortened the first saccade onset latencies. Active condition onset latencies were shorter than in either of the passive conditions, showing a consistent head-leads-eye pattern defining a specific behavioral pattern that could vary across patient groups leading to insights into central neural mechanisms that control eye-head coordination.
在正常健康参与者中,当头部被动或主动移动时,眼球稳定性能受到不同的影响。然而,对于视觉固视抑制任务,尚不清楚被动或主动头部运动是否会以不同的方式影响头部和眼睛运动的协调模式。我们使用了抑制性头部脉冲范式 (SHIMP),在该范式中,受试者的目标是在头部快速脉冲运动期间保持注视在与头部一起移动的视觉目标上,以评估三种条件下的注视固定性能:(1) 被动不可预测,其中检查者以随机的时间和方向施加脉冲性头部偏航旋转,(2) 被动可预测,其中宣布头部旋转的方向,然后检查者反复施加相同方向的脉冲,以及 (3) 主动,其中测试对象自己产生头部运动。13 名年轻健康成年人完成了所有三种条件,以评估启动注视向最终视觉目标位置的早期扫视的百分比和第一次扫视的潜伏期。早期扫视被定义为发生在头部脉冲持续时间内的扫视。结果表明,主动头部脉冲产生的早期扫视百分比最大,其次是可预测和不可预测。在两种被动条件中,可预测性缩短了第一次扫视的起始潜伏期。主动条件的起始潜伏期短于任何一种被动条件,表现出一致的头部领先于眼睛的模式,定义了一种特定的行为模式,这种模式可能因患者群体而异,从而深入了解控制眼头协调的中枢神经机制。