• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进和抑制道德声音:同事的情绪与对声音的支持。

Promotive and prohibitive ethical voice: Coworker emotions and support for the voice.

机构信息

Department of Management and Organisation, National University of Singapore.

Department of Management and Organization, Pennsylvania State University.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2022 Nov;107(11):1973-1994. doi: 10.1037/apl0001003. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1037/apl0001003
PMID:34990163
Abstract

Despite the importance of ethical voice for advancing ethics in organizations, we know little about how coworkers respond to ethical voice in their work units. Drawing on the fundamental approach/avoidance behavioral system and the promotive and prohibitive distinction in the voice literature, we distinguish between promotive and prohibitive ethical voice and propose that they engender different emotions-elevation (an approach-oriented moral emotion) and feelings of threat (an avoidance-oriented emotion), respectively, in coworkers. We propose that these emotions differentially influence coworker subsequent responses to the ethical voice behavior. In a time-lagged critical incident survey and two experimental studies, we consistently found support for our hypothesis that promotive ethical voice elicits moral elevation in coworkers with subsequent coworker verbal support for the ethical voice (an approach-oriented response). However, results for prohibitive ethical voice were more complex because prohibitive ethical voice leads to mixed emotions in coworkers. It sometimes leads to feelings of threat, with indirect negative effects via threat on coworker support. But surprisingly, it also leads to coworker elevation and hence can have positive indirect effects via elevation on coworker support. We will discuss the research and practical implications of these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

尽管在组织中倡导道德规范的声音对于推进道德规范至关重要,但我们对同事在工作单位中对道德规范的声音的反应知之甚少。本研究借鉴基本的趋近/回避行为系统和声音文献中的促进和禁止区分,区分了促进性和禁止性的道德规范声音,并提出它们分别在同事中引发不同的情绪——提升(一种以趋近为导向的道德情绪)和威胁感(一种以回避为导向的情绪)。我们提出,这些情绪会对同事对道德规范声音行为的后续反应产生不同的影响。在时间滞后的关键事件调查和两项实验研究中,我们一致发现,我们的假设得到了支持,即促进性道德规范声音会在同事中引发道德提升,从而对道德规范声音产生后续的同事口头支持(一种以趋近为导向的反应)。然而,禁止性道德规范声音的结果则更为复杂,因为禁止性道德规范声音会在同事中引发混合情绪。它有时会导致威胁感,通过威胁对同事支持产生间接的负面影响。但令人惊讶的是,它也会引发同事的提升,从而通过提升对同事支持产生积极的间接影响。我们将讨论这些发现的研究和实践意义。

相似文献

1
Promotive and prohibitive ethical voice: Coworker emotions and support for the voice.促进和抑制道德声音:同事的情绪与对声音的支持。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Nov;107(11):1973-1994. doi: 10.1037/apl0001003. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
The dispositional antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice.促进性和禁止性声音的性格前因。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Sep;101(9):1342-51. doi: 10.1037/apl0000130. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
3
My manager endorsed my coworkers' voice: Understanding observers' positive and negative reactions to managerial endorsement of coworker voice.我的经理认可了同事的意见:理解观察者对经理认可同事意见的积极和消极反应。
J Appl Psychol. 2024 Aug;109(8):1250-1270. doi: 10.1037/apl0001180. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
4
The consequences of ethical voice inside the organization: An integrative review.组织内部道德声音的后果:综合述评。
J Appl Psychol. 2023 Aug;108(8):1316-1335. doi: 10.1037/apl0001075. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
Nonlinear consequences of promotive and prohibitive voice for managers' responses: The roles of voice frequency and LMX.促进性和抑制性声音对管理者反应的非线性影响:声音频率和 LMX 的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Oct;103(10):1101-1120. doi: 10.1037/apl0000326. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
6
The content of the message matters: The differential effects of promotive and prohibitive team voice on team productivity and safety performance gains.信息内容很重要:促进性和禁止性团队发声对团队生产力和安全绩效增益的差异影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Aug;102(8):1259-1270. doi: 10.1037/apl0000215. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
Does voice endorsement by supervisors enhance or constrain voicer's personal initiative? Countervailing effects via feeling pride and feeling envied.主管的声音认可会增强还是限制发声者的个人主动性?通过感到自豪和感到羡慕产生的制衡效应。
J Appl Psychol. 2024 Sep;109(9):1408-1430. doi: 10.1037/apl0001191. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
8
Linking Abusive Supervision to Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Behavior: Testing the Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Negative Reciprocity.将虐待性监督与促进性和禁止性建言行为联系起来:检验工作投入和消极互惠的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 1;19(9):5498. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095498.
9
I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: A moderated mediating process of promotive versus prohibitive voice.如果我的声音符合社会期望,我会说出来:促进性与禁止性声音的中介调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1641-52. doi: 10.1037/a0039046. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
10
Are coworkers getting into the act? An examination of emotion regulation in coworker exchanges.同事们也参与其中了吗?对同事交流中的情绪调节的考察。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Aug;105(8):907-929. doi: 10.1037/apl0000473. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Leader prohibitive voice shapes employee voice through psychological safety moderated by self-efficacy and generational differences.领导的抑制性声音通过由自我效能感和代际差异调节的心理安全感来塑造员工的声音。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 26;15(1):31469. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17500-5.