Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University.
Department of Psychology, Concordia University.
Am Psychol. 2021 Oct;76(7):1194-1195. doi: 10.1037/amp0000920.
VanderWeele and Kubzansky (2021) provide a commentary on Scheier et al. (2021), in which they introduce the distinction between what they term comparative and absolute optimism. We believe that more conceptual and empirical work is needed before a full understanding of the meaning and implications of the terms can be known. In contrast, the construal of optimism and pessimism as separate but related dimensions is founded on decades of research. Moreover, as shown in Scheier et al. (2021), the absence of pessimism is a better predictor of physical health outcomes than is the presence of optimism, which in turn has implications for how interventions might be devised. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
范德维勒和库班斯基(2021)对谢耶等人(2021)的研究进行了评论,他们在研究中引入了相对乐观和绝对乐观之间的区别。我们认为,在充分了解这些术语的含义和影响之前,需要进行更多的概念和实证研究。相比之下,将乐观和悲观视为独立但相关的维度的观点是基于几十年的研究得出的。此外,正如谢耶等人(2021)所示,与存在乐观相比,缺乏悲观是身体健康结果的更好预测指标,这反过来又对如何设计干预措施产生了影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。