Suppr超能文献

乐观主义与悲观主义对身体健康的预测作用:性格乐观主义研究的综合再分析。

Optimism versus pessimism as predictors of physical health: A comprehensive reanalysis of dispositional optimism research.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University.

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2021 Apr;76(3):529-548. doi: 10.1037/amp0000666. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

Abstract

Prior research has related dispositional optimism to physical health. Traditionally, dispositional optimism is treated as a bipolar construct, anchored at one end by optimism and the other by pessimism. Optimism and pessimism, however, may not be diametrically opposed, but rather may reflect 2 independent, but related dimensions. This article reports a reanalysis of data from previously published studies on dispositional optimism. The reanalysis was designed to evaluate whether the presence of optimism or the absence of pessimism predicted positive physical health more strongly. Relevant literatures were screened for studies relating dispositional optimism to physical health. Authors of relevant studies were asked to join a consortium, the purpose of which was to reanalyze previously published data sets separating optimism and pessimism into distinguishable components. Ultimately, data were received from 61 separate samples ( = 221,133). Meta-analytic analysis of data in which optimism and pessimism were combined into an overall index (the typical procedure) revealed a significant positive association with an aggregated measure of physical health outcomes ( = .026, < .001), as did meta-analytic analyses with the absence of pessimism ( = .029, < .001) and the presence of optimism ( = .011, < .018) separately. The effect size for pessimism was significantly larger than the effect size for optimism ( = -2.403, < .02). Thus, the absence of pessimism was more strongly related to positive health outcomes than was the presence of optimism. Implications of the findings for future research and clinical interventions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

先前的研究将性格倾向乐观与身体健康联系起来。传统上,性格倾向乐观被视为一种两极化的结构,一端是乐观,另一端是悲观。然而,乐观和悲观可能并非完全对立,而可能反映出两个独立但相关的维度。本文重新分析了先前发表的关于性格倾向乐观的研究数据。重新分析旨在评估存在乐观或不存在悲观是否能更有力地预测身体健康状况良好。对与性格倾向乐观与身体健康相关的研究进行了相关文献筛选。要求相关研究的作者加入一个财团,其目的是重新分析先前发表的数据集,将乐观和悲观分为可区分的成分。最终,从 61 个独立样本中收到数据(n = 221,133)。将乐观和悲观结合成一个总体指数的数据分析(典型程序)的元分析显示,与身体健康结果的综合衡量标准呈显著正相关(β =.026, <.001),与不存在悲观(β =.029, <.001)和存在乐观(β =.011, <.018)的元分析也呈显著正相关。悲观的效应大小显著大于乐观的效应大小(β = -2.403, <.02)。因此,不存在悲观与积极的健康结果的关系比存在乐观更为密切。对未来研究和临床干预的影响进行了讨论。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验