Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
Am Psychol. 2021 Oct;76(7):1191-1193. doi: 10.1037/amp0000864.
In light of the analyses of Scheier et al. (2021) concerning differential associations of optimism and pessimism measures with physical health, we argue here that whether optimism and pessimism are bipolar, lying on separate ends of a spectrum, or whether they represent two separate dimensions is a conceptual, rather than an empirical, question. Differential associations of various indicators, or indicator sets, with health may indeed be of interest, but there are also different ways of grouping indicators other than whether items are worded to correspond to optimism or pessimism. We do nevertheless believe that the analyses of Scheier et al. (2021) can be useful in helping guide intervention development in precisely the ways they suggest. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
鉴于 Scheier 等人(2021)对乐观和悲观测量与身体健康的差异关联的分析,我们在这里认为,乐观和悲观是否是两极的,处于一个连续体的两个极端,或者它们是否代表两个独立的维度,这是一个概念上的问题,而不是经验上的问题。各种指标或指标集与健康的差异关联确实可能是有趣的,但除了项目的措辞是否对应于乐观或悲观之外,还有不同的分组指标的方法。然而,我们确实认为,Scheier 等人(2021)的分析可以帮助指导干预措施的发展,正是他们所建议的方式。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。