Doub James B
Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Dec 23;14:5629-5637. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S341265. eCollection 2021.
Bacteriophage therapy is a promising adjuvant therapeutic in the treatment of multidrug-resistant infections and chronic biofilm infections. However, there is limited knowledge about how to best utilize these agents in vivo, leading to a wide range of treatment protocols. Moreover, while bacteriophages are similar to antibiotics in their antimicrobial effects, these are active viruses and are very different from conventional antibiotics. One main difference that clinicians should be cognizant about is the potential ability of these therapeutics to horizontally transfer genetic material, and the clinical ramifications of such events. In addition, while bacteriophage therapeutics are readily tested for sterility and endotoxins, clinicians should also be aware of other contaminants, such as exotoxins, pathogenicity islands and prophages, that can contaminate bacteriophage therapeutics, and their clinical ramifications. While the perception may be that these are only theoretical issues, regulatory agencies are starting to recommend their evaluation when using bacteriophage therapy and subsequently these topics are discussed herein, as are ways to test for and mitigate the adverse effects of these issues.
噬菌体疗法在治疗多重耐药感染和慢性生物膜感染方面是一种很有前景的辅助治疗方法。然而,对于如何在体内最佳地利用这些制剂,人们了解有限,这导致了广泛的治疗方案。此外,虽然噬菌体在抗菌作用方面与抗生素相似,但它们是活性病毒,与传统抗生素有很大不同。临床医生应该认识到的一个主要区别是,这些治疗方法具有水平转移遗传物质的潜在能力,以及此类事件的临床后果。另外,虽然噬菌体疗法很容易检测无菌性和内毒素,但临床医生也应该意识到其他污染物,如外毒素、致病岛和前噬菌体,它们可能污染噬菌体疗法,以及它们的临床后果。虽然可能认为这些只是理论问题,但监管机构在使用噬菌体疗法时开始建议对其进行评估,因此本文将讨论这些主题,以及检测和减轻这些问题不利影响的方法。