Suppr超能文献

无窥镜下眼睑牵拉技术在玻璃体腔内注射中对焦虑和疼痛感知的影响。

Anxiety and pain perception using a speculum-free eyelid retraction technique for intravitreal injection.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Affiliated with the Hebrew University - Hadassah School of Medicine, 9103102, Jerusalem, Israel.

Departments of Psychology, Ariel University, 44837, Ariel, Israel.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;260(6):2023-2028. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05422-7. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study compared pain and anxiety levels in individuals receiving intravitreal injections (IVIs) using a speculum-free injection technique, the lid splinting eyelid retraction technique, or using a speculum.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of individuals receiving IVI at a single tertiary care medical center who responded to a questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) between December 2019 and January 2020. In one group, a speculum was used prior to injection, whereas in the other group, a speculum-free injection technique was used.

RESULTS

A total of 108 individuals were included in this study: 54 received IVI with the speculum-free lid splinting eyelid retraction technique and 54 received IVI with a speculum. A correlation between pain and anxiety was demonstrated in the control group (p-value < 0.01); however, in the speculum-free group, this correlation was lower and not significant. When comparing pain and anxiety between the study groups, lower median pain (Mood's: Z = 5.378, p-value < 0.001) and lower anxiety (Mood's: Z = 2.108, p-value = 0.035) scores were demonstrated in the speculum-free group than in the control group. The distribution of pain scores was significantly different between the study groups (Kolmogorov-Smirnov: D = 0.518, p-value < 0.001), and trending differences in anxiety between the groups were observed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov: D = 0.259, p-value = 0.053).

CONCLUSION

The lid splinting eyelid retraction technique, a speculum-free technique, was associated with less anxiety and pain in patients than the use of a speculum. As IVI often involves repeated treatment, identifying modifiable factors that may relieve anxiety and pain is of utmost importance.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了使用无窥器注射技术、眼睑撑开术和使用窥器进行玻璃体腔内注射(IVI)的个体的疼痛和焦虑水平。

方法

这是一项在 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 1 月期间在一家三级护理医疗中心接受 IVI 的个体的前瞻性研究,他们回答了一份问卷并进行了视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估。在一组中,在注射前使用窥器,而在另一组中,使用无窥器注射技术。

结果

本研究共纳入 108 例个体:54 例接受无窥器眼睑撑开术和 54 例接受有窥器的 IVI。对照组中显示疼痛和焦虑之间存在相关性(p 值<0.01);然而,在无窥器组中,这种相关性较低且不显著。当比较研究组之间的疼痛和焦虑时,无窥器组的中位数疼痛(Mood's:Z=5.378,p 值<0.001)和焦虑(Mood's:Z=2.108,p 值=0.035)评分较低。两组间疼痛评分的分布存在显著差异(Kolmogorov-Smirnov:D=0.518,p 值<0.001),并且观察到组间焦虑存在趋势性差异(Kolmogorov-Smirnov:D=0.259,p 值=0.053)。

结论

与使用窥器相比,无窥器眼睑撑开术与患者的焦虑和疼痛减轻相关。由于 IVI 通常需要多次治疗,因此确定可能减轻焦虑和疼痛的可调节因素至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验