Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助计算机导航能否改善Crowe III/IV型髋关节发育不良患者全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯的定位?一项倾向评分病例匹配分析。

Does robotic-assisted computer navigation improve acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe III/IV hip dysplasia? A propensity score case-match analysis.

作者信息

Chai Wei, Xu Chi, Guo Ren-Wen, Kong Xiang-Peng, Fu Jun, Tang Pei-Fu, Chen Ji-Ying

机构信息

Senior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2022 Apr;46(4):769-777. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05232-w. Epub 2022 Jan 8.

Abstract

AIMS

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with hip-dislocation dysplasia remains challenging. This study aims to evaluate whether these patients may benefit from robotic-assisted techniques.

METHODS

We reviewed 135 THAs (108 conventional THAs and 27 robotic-assisted THAs) for Crowe type III or IV from January 2017 to August 2019 in our institution. Robotic-assisted THAs were matched with conventional THAs at a 1:1 ratio (27 hips each group) using propensity score matching. The accuracy of cup positioning and clinical outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The inclination of the cup for conventional THAs and robotic THAs was 42.1 ± 5.7 and 41.3 ± 4.6 (p = 0.574), respectively. The anteversion of the cup for conventional THAs was significantly greater than that of robotic THAs (29.5 ± 8.1 and 18.0 ± 4.6; p < 0.001), respectively. The ratio of the acetabular cup in the Lewinnek safe zone was 37% (10/27) in conventional THAs and 96.3% (26/27) in robotic THAs (p < 0.001). Robotic THAs did not achieve better leg length discrepancy than that of conventional THAs (- 0.4 ± 10.9 mm vs. 0.4 ± 8.8 mm, p = 0.774). There was no difference in Harris Hip Score and WOMAC Osteoarthritis index between groups at the 2-year follow-up. No dislocation occurred in all cases at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted THA for patients with high dislocation improves the accuracy of the implantation of the acetabular component with respect to safe zone.

摘要

目的

髋关节脱位发育不良患者的全髋关节置换术(THA)仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估这些患者是否能从机器人辅助技术中获益。

方法

我们回顾了2017年1月至2019年8月在我院进行的135例针对Crowe III型或IV型的THA(108例传统THA和27例机器人辅助THA)。使用倾向得分匹配法将机器人辅助THA与传统THA按1:1比例匹配(每组27髋)。比较两组之间髋臼杯定位的准确性和临床结果。

结果

传统THA和机器人辅助THA的髋臼杯倾斜度分别为42.1±5.7和41.3±4.6(p = 0.574)。传统THA的髋臼杯前倾角显著大于机器人辅助THA(分别为29.5±8.1和18.0±4.6;p < 0.001)。传统THA中髋臼杯位于Lewinnek安全区内的比例为37%(10/27),机器人辅助THA中为96.3%(26/27)(p < 0.001)。机器人辅助THA在肢体长度差异方面并未比传统THA表现更好(-0.4±10.9 mm对0.4±8.8 mm,p = 0.774)。在2年随访时,两组之间的Harris髋关节评分和WOMAC骨关节炎指数没有差异。最终随访时所有病例均未发生脱位。

结论

对于高位脱位患者,机器人辅助THA提高了髋臼组件在安全区内植入的准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验