• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“没有人是为了钱或生活方式而这样做的”:美国南部影响堕胎服务提供者劳动力招募和保留的因素的观点。

"No One Does This for the Money or Lifestyle": Abortion Providers' Perspectives on Factors Affecting Workforce Recruitment and Retention in the Southern United States.

机构信息

Health Equity and Rights Team, CARE USA, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2022 Jun;26(6):1350-1357. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03338-6. Epub 2022 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-021-03338-6
PMID:34997437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9132807/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Movements to stem abortion accessibility and provision are underway across the southern United States. Preserving access to safe abortion requires a steady maternal health workforce. Targeted laws and limiting environments have contributed to a regional dearth of abortion providers. This study evaluates the consequences of restrictive environments for the abortion workforce to inform strategies to reduce the provider shortage in the South.

METHODS

We recruited twelve physicians using purposive sampling and interviewed them on their motivations and experiences practicing in the South. We employed grounded theory analysis to translate their perspectives into recommendations for provider recruitment and retention.

RESULTS

Abortion providers identified challenges relating to restrictive legislation, institutional separation of abortion from other medical services, training unavailability, safety concerns, identity struggles, and marginalization within their profession. This contributed to providers widely experiencing stigma and isolation within their work and life environments. Their motivations for practicing in the South despite these challenges included wanting to be impactful in areas of high need, combating health access disparites, and having personal ties to the region. Providers' suggested increasing regional networking and training opportunities, creating an information clearinghouse, and offering additional compensation to better support their work. We conceptualized these findings into a framework detailing the challenges, impacts and opportunities for abortion provision in the southern United States.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

Our recommendations for provider recruitment and retention include cooperation between professional organizations, training programs, and healthcare institutions to create opportunities for training and networking and encourage abortion-supportive organizational and policy environments.

摘要

目的

美国南部各地正在采取行动,限制堕胎的可及性和提供。维护安全堕胎的机会需要一支稳定的孕产妇保健劳动力。有针对性的法律和限制环境导致该地区堕胎服务提供者短缺。本研究评估了限制性环境对堕胎劳动力的影响,以为减少南部堕胎提供者短缺的策略提供信息。

方法

我们通过目的性抽样招募了 12 名医生,并对他们在南部执业的动机和经验进行了访谈。我们采用扎根理论分析,将他们的观点转化为招聘和留住提供者的建议。

结果

堕胎提供者确定了与限制性立法、堕胎与其他医疗服务机构分离、培训机会缺乏、安全问题、身份斗争以及职业边缘化相关的挑战。这导致提供者在工作和生活环境中普遍感到耻辱和孤立。尽管面临这些挑战,他们仍选择在南部执业的动机包括希望在高需求地区产生影响、对抗卫生服务获取差距以及与该地区有个人联系。提供者建议增加区域网络和培训机会,创建信息中心,并提供额外的补偿,以更好地支持他们的工作。我们将这些发现概念化为一个框架,详细说明了美国南部堕胎提供的挑战、影响和机会。

实践结论

我们对招聘和留住提供者的建议包括专业组织、培训计划和医疗机构之间的合作,以创造培训和网络机会,并鼓励支持堕胎的组织和政策环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4039/9132807/dab8bed40cc2/10995_2021_3338_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4039/9132807/dab8bed40cc2/10995_2021_3338_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4039/9132807/dab8bed40cc2/10995_2021_3338_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
"No One Does This for the Money or Lifestyle": Abortion Providers' Perspectives on Factors Affecting Workforce Recruitment and Retention in the Southern United States.“没有人是为了钱或生活方式而这样做的”:美国南部影响堕胎服务提供者劳动力招募和保留的因素的观点。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Jun;26(6):1350-1357. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03338-6. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
4
Individual abortion providers' experiences with targeted harassment in the United States.美国个别堕胎提供者遭遇有针对性骚扰的经历。
Contraception. 2022 Mar;107:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.09.014. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
5
Health care providers' attitudes towards termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study in South Africa.医疗服务提供者对终止妊娠的态度:南非的一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Aug 18;9:296. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-296.
6
Recruitment and retention strategies for expert nurses in abortion care provision.为堕胎护理服务招募和留住专业护士的策略。
Contraception. 2015 Jun;91(6):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
7
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Maternal-fetal medicine subspecialist survey on abortion training and service provision.母胎医学会特别声明:母胎医学专家关于堕胎培训和服务提供的调查。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):B2-B11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.220. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Barriers to and Enablers of Abortion Provision for Family Physicians Trained in Abortion During Residency.家庭医生在住院医师培训期间接受堕胎培训后提供堕胎服务的障碍和促进因素。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Sep;52(3):151-159. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12154. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
9
Providing safe abortion services: Experiences and perspectives of providers in South Africa.提供安全的堕胎服务:南非提供者的经验和观点。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Abortion providers, professional identity, and restrictive laws: A qualitative study.堕胎服务提供者、职业身份与限制性法律:一项定性研究。
Health Care Women Int. 2017 Mar;38(3):222-237. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2016.1254218. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Boundaries: Navigating Challenges and Charting the Future of Reproductive Health Care in the Post- Landscape.超越界限:在后格局中应对生殖健康护理的挑战并规划未来
Am J Public Health. 2025 Jul;115(7):1037-1041. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2025.308084. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
"We just need to create as many avenues for access as we possibly can": Clinician and administrator attitudes toward telehealth medication abortion in the U.S. South.“我们只需要尽可能多地创造获取途径”:美国南部临床医生和管理人员对远程医疗药物流产的态度。
Contracept X. 2024 Oct 9;6:100112. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100112. eCollection 2024.
3
Providers' experiences with abortion care: A scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to and Enablers of Abortion Provision for Family Physicians Trained in Abortion During Residency.家庭医生在住院医师培训期间接受堕胎培训后提供堕胎服务的障碍和促进因素。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Sep;52(3):151-159. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12154. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
2
Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice.美国获取临床堕胎护理的距离以及选择诊所的原因。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Dec;28(12):1623-1631. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7496. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
3
Self-reported Physical Health of Women Who Did and Did Not Terminate Pregnancy After Seeking Abortion Services: A Cohort Study.
提供者实施堕胎护理的体验:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 1;19(7):e0303601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303601. eCollection 2024.
4
Health providers' reasons for participating in abortion care: A scoping review.卫生提供者参与堕胎护理的原因:范围综述。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241233124. doi: 10.1177/17455057241233124.
5
A narrative review of challenges related to healthcare worker rights, roles and responsibilities in the provision of sexual and reproductive services in health facilities.卫生保健机构提供性与生殖服务相关的医护人员权利、角色与职责的挑战:叙述性回顾
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov;8(Suppl 4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012421.
6
Abortion providers in the United States: expanding beyond obstetrics and gynecology.美国的堕胎服务提供者:超越妇产科领域的拓展
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Feb 25;3(2):100186. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100186. eCollection 2023 May.
7
"Post-" Abortion Policy Context Heightens the Imperative for Multilevel, Comprehensive, Integrated Health Education.“后-堕胎政策”背景下,强化多层次、综合、全面的健康教育势在必行。
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Dec;49(6):913-918. doi: 10.1177/10901981221125399. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
寻求堕胎服务后选择终止妊娠和未终止妊娠的女性自我报告的身体健康状况:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 20;171(4):238-247. doi: 10.7326/M18-1666. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
4
Population Group Abortion Rates and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion: United States, 2008-2014.2008 - 2014年美国不同人群的堕胎率及堕胎终身发生率
Am J Public Health. 2017 Dec;107(12):1904-1909. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304042. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
5
TRAP laws and the invisible labor of US abortion providers.《限制堕胎法案》与美国堕胎提供者的无形劳动
Crit Public Health. 2016;26(1):77-87. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2015.1077205. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
6
Commentary: abortion provider stigma and mainstream medicine.评论:堕胎服务提供者的污名化与主流医学
Women Health. 2014;54(7):666-71. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2014.919985.
7
The public health threat of anti-abortion legislation.反堕胎立法对公共卫生的威胁。
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):73-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.012. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
8
Physicians, abortion provision and the legitimacy paradox.医生、堕胎规定和合法性悖论。
Contraception. 2013 Jan;87(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.031. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
9
Barriers and enablers to becoming abortion providers: the reproductive health program.成为堕胎提供者的障碍与促进因素:生殖健康项目
Fam Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(7):493-500.
10
Dynamics of stigma in abortion work: findings from a pilot study of the Providers Share Workshop.堕胎工作中的污名动态: Providers Share Workshop 试点研究的结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(7):1062-70. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Jul 28.