Bringmann Laura F, Albers Casper, Bockting Claudi, Borsboom Denny, Ceulemans Eva, Cramer Angélique, Epskamp Sacha, Eronen Markus I, Hamaker Ellen, Kuppens Peter, Lutz Wolfgang, McNally Richard J, Molenaar Peter, Tio Pia, Voelkle Manuel C, Wichers Marieke
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), P.O. Box 30.001 (CC72), 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands; University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Behav Res Ther. 2022 Feb;149:104011. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.104011. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
In recent years, network approaches to psychopathology have sparked much debate and have had a significant impact on how mental disorders are perceived in the field of clinical psychology. However, there are many important challenges in moving from theory to empirical research and clinical practice and vice versa. Therefore, in this article, we bring together different points of view on psychological networks by methodologists and clinicians to give a critical overview on these challenges, and to present an agenda for addressing these challenges. In contrast to previous reviews, we especially focus on methodological issues related to temporal networks. This includes topics such as selecting and assessing the quality of the nodes in the network, distinguishing between- and within-person effects in networks, relating items that are measured at different time scales, and dealing with changes in network structures. These issues are not only important for researchers using network models on empirical data, but also for clinicians, who are increasingly likely to encounter (person-specific) networks in the consulting room.
近年来，精神病理学的网络方法引发了诸多争论，并对临床心理学领域如何看待精神障碍产生了重大影响。然而，从理论到实证研究以及临床实践，反之亦然，这一过程存在许多重大挑战。因此，在本文中，我们汇集了方法学家和临床医生对心理网络的不同观点，对这些挑战进行批判性概述，并提出应对这些挑战的议程。与以往的综述不同，我们特别关注与时间网络相关的方法学问题。这包括诸如选择和评估网络中节点的质量、区分网络中的个体间效应和个体内效应、关联在不同时间尺度上测量的项目以及处理网络结构的变化等主题。这些问题不仅对使用网络模型处理实证数据的研究人员很重要，对于临床医生也很重要，因为他们在咨询室中越来越有可能遇到（针对个体的）网络。
