Salsabilla Aisha, Azzahra Alifia B, Syafitri Raden I P, Supadmi Woro, Suwantika Auliya A
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Dec 29;14:3587-3596. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S332579. eCollection 2021.
In the area where there is a lack of medical experts, telemedicine gives a lot of benefits to deal with the distance and limited public infrastructure.
This study aimed to review the literature on the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine in Asian countries and possibly to provide recommendations on implementing telemedicine in this region.
Articles were independently screened in two selected databases (PubMed and EBSCO). The framework of patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) was applied by considering Asian population, the intervention of telemedicine, current situation (without telemedicine) as the comparator, and cost per QALY gained as the major outcome.
A total of 870 articles were identified from two databases: PubMed (n = 689 articles) and EBSCO (n = 181 articles). After removing 181 duplicates, 689 articles were screened by title and abstract, excluding 665 records. After the full-text screening on 24 articles, 8 articles were selected for further analysis. Various perspectives were applied in the included studies, such as societal, healthcare, and program perspectives. All studies applied different time horizons, such as 3-month, 25-year, 40-year, and lifetime. Among all included studies, several studies applied mathematical modeling.
The implementation of telemedicine in Asia can be a promising intervention since it can enhance the effectiveness of health services by saving time and travel costs. It also can reduce the overall costs of treatment, improve patients' quality of life, and expand access to essential health services.
在缺乏医学专家的地区,远程医疗在应对距离问题和有限的公共基础设施方面带来了诸多益处。
本研究旨在回顾亚洲国家远程医疗成本效益的相关文献,并可能为该地区实施远程医疗提供建议。
在两个选定的数据库(PubMed和EBSCO)中独立筛选文章。采用患者、干预措施、对照和结果(PICO)框架,将亚洲人群、远程医疗干预措施、现状(无远程医疗)作为对照,以及每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本作为主要结果。
从两个数据库共识别出870篇文章:PubMed(689篇文章)和EBSCO(181篇文章)。去除181篇重复文章后,通过标题和摘要筛选出689篇文章,排除665条记录。对24篇文章进行全文筛选后,选择8篇文章进行进一步分析。纳入研究采用了各种视角,如社会、医疗保健和项目视角。所有研究采用了不同的时间范围,如3个月、25年、40年和终身。在所有纳入研究中,有几项研究采用了数学建模。
在亚洲实施远程医疗可能是一项有前景的干预措施,因为它可以通过节省时间和差旅费来提高卫生服务的有效性。它还可以降低总体治疗成本,提高患者生活质量,并扩大获得基本卫生服务的机会。