Lado-Codesido María, Rey Varela Rosa María, Larios Quiñones Marina, Martínez Agulleiro Luis, Ossa Basanes Julieta, Martínez Querol María, Mateos Raimundo, Spuch Carlos, García-Caballero Alejandro
University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Department of Psychiatry, Donostia University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:739252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739252. eCollection 2021.
Emotion recognition of voices may play an important role in interpersonal communication and patients with schizophrenia present alterations in this regard. Several on-line rehabilitation tools have been developed for treatment in this area. is an on-line prosodic recognition program consisting of identifying different emotional tones in neutral phrases, in different sessions of gradually increasing difficulty. This training tool has previously reported benefits, and a new version has been created called . The main aim of this study is to test the capacity of the program to improve emotion recognition through prosody for adults with schizophrenia. Secondly, it seeks to observe durability effects 1 month after intervention. A randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial was conducted with 44 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The intervention group (also called ) was treated with , whereas the control group was treated with auditory training that was not related to emotions. Sociodemographic and clinical data, clinical state (PANSS), Intelligence Quotient and prosodic recognition (RMV-SV) were measured at baseline. After intervention, RMV-SV and PANSS were assessed. One month later, the RMV-SV measure was repeated. The control group ( = 19) and the group ( = 22) did not differ on χ, t or tests in sociodemographic, clinical and psychometric variables at baseline or post-intervention (all -values > 0.05). In the group, statistically significant differences were observed in the RMV-SV scale applied post-intervention vs. that applied pre-intervention ( = 2.47, = 0.013). Similar results were observed in the 1-month follow-up RMV-SV vs. the pre-intervention RMV-SV ( = 1.97, = 0.049). PANSS scale was also assessed with no significant differences between pre vs. post measures in both groups. Lastly, was rated relatively higher, based on its ease of understanding, entertainment value, usefulness and the appropriateness of use of its emotional glossary. Improvements were observed in prosodic recognition following intervention with in the group. Although these results are similar to other clinical trial rehabilitation programs, specific research on the matter remains scarce. Certain aspects, such as the durability of effects or adherence should be thoroughly studied and clarified. [https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/G95C4].
语音情感识别在人际交流中可能起着重要作用，而精神分裂症患者在这方面存在改变。已经开发了几种在线康复工具用于该领域的治疗。是一个在线韵律识别程序，包括在难度逐渐增加的不同阶段识别中性短语中的不同情感语调。该训练工具此前已报告有疗效，并且创建了一个新版本，称为。本研究的主要目的是测试程序通过韵律改善成人精神分裂症患者情感识别的能力。其次，它试图观察干预1个月后的持久效果。对44名被诊断为精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍的门诊患者进行了一项随机、单盲、多中心临床试验。干预组（也称为）接受治疗，而对照组接受与情感无关的听觉训练。在基线时测量社会人口统计学和临床数据、临床状态（阳性和阴性症状量表）、智商和韵律识别（韵律匹配语音情感量表）。干预后，评估韵律匹配语音情感量表和阳性和阴性症状量表。1个月后，重复韵律匹配语音情感量表测量。对照组（=19）和组（=22）在基线或干预后的社会人口统计学、临床和心理测量变量的χ、t或检验中没有差异（所有p值>0.05）。在组中，观察到干预后应用的韵律匹配语音情感量表与干预前应用的量表之间存在统计学显著差异（=2.47，=0.013）。在干预后1个月的韵律匹配语音情感量表与干预前的韵律匹配语音情感量表的比较中也观察到了类似结果（=1.97，=0.049）。两组在阳性和阴性症状量表的测量中，前后测量之间也没有显著差异。最后，根据其易理解性、娱乐价值、有用性及其情感词汇表使用的适当性，被评为相对较高。在组中，干预后韵律识别有改善。尽管这些结果与其他临床试验康复项目相似，但对此事的具体研究仍然很少。某些方面，如效果的持久性或依从性，应进行深入研究和阐明。[https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/G95C4]
