• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

镇静诱导爆发抑制可预测创伤性脑损伤后的良好预后。

Sedation-Induced Burst Suppression Predicts Positive Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

作者信息

Frohlich Joel, Johnson Micah A, McArthur David L, Lutkenhoff Evan S, Dell'Italia John, Real Courtney, Shrestha Vikesh, Spivak Norman M, Ruiz Tejeda Jesús E, Vespa Paul M, Monti Martin M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Injury Research Center (BIRC), UCLA Brain Injury Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 22;12:750667. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.750667. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2021.750667
PMID:35002918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8727767/
Abstract

While electroencephalogram (EEG) burst-suppression is often induced therapeutically using sedatives in the intensive care unit (ICU), there is hitherto no evidence with respect to its association to outcome in moderate-to-severe neurological patients. We examined the relationship between sedation-induced burst-suppression (SIBS) and outcome at hospital discharge and at 6-month follow up in patients surviving moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). For each of 32 patients recovering from coma after moderate-to-severe TBI, we measured the EEG burst suppression ratio (BSR) during periods of low responsiveness as assessed with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). The maximum BSR was then used to predict the Glasgow Outcome Scale extended (GOSe) at discharge and at 6 months post-injury. A multi-model inference approach was used to assess the combination of predictors that best fit the outcome data. We found that BSR was positively associated with outcomes at 6 months ( = 0.022) but did not predict outcomes at discharge. A mediation analysis found no evidence that BSR mediates the effects of barbiturates or propofol on outcomes. Our results provide initial observational evidence that burst suppression may be neuroprotective in acute patients with TBI etiologies. SIBS may thus be useful in the ICU as a prognostic biomarker.

摘要

虽然在重症监护病房(ICU)中,脑电图(EEG)爆发抑制常常通过使用镇静剂进行治疗性诱导,但迄今为止,尚无证据表明其与中重度神经系统疾病患者的预后相关。我们研究了中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)幸存者中,镇静诱导爆发抑制(SIBS)与出院时及伤后6个月随访时预后之间的关系。对于32例从中重度TBI昏迷中恢复的患者,我们在以格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评估的低反应期测量了EEG爆发抑制率(BSR)。然后,使用最大BSR预测出院时及伤后6个月的格拉斯哥扩展预后量表(GOSe)。采用多模型推断方法评估最符合预后数据的预测因子组合。我们发现,BSR与6个月时的预后呈正相关( = 0.022),但不能预测出院时的预后。中介分析未发现证据表明BSR介导巴比妥类药物或丙泊酚对预后的影响。我们的结果提供了初步的观察证据,表明爆发抑制可能对急性TBI病因患者具有神经保护作用。因此,SIBS可能在ICU中作为一种预后生物标志物有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca3c/8727767/1b574b6a1913/fneur-12-750667-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca3c/8727767/1b574b6a1913/fneur-12-750667-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca3c/8727767/1b574b6a1913/fneur-12-750667-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Sedation-Induced Burst Suppression Predicts Positive Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury.镇静诱导爆发抑制可预测创伤性脑损伤后的良好预后。
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 22;12:750667. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.750667. eCollection 2021.
2
Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study.创伤性脑损伤患者的病例组合、护理路径和结局在 CENTER-TBI 中的研究:一项欧洲前瞻性、多中心、纵向、队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Oct;18(10):923-934. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30232-7.
3
Analysis of long-term (median 10.5 years) outcomes in children presenting with traumatic brain injury and an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 or 4.对初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3或4分的创伤性脑损伤患儿的长期(中位时间10.5年)预后分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Oct;16(4):410-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14679. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
4
Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: effect of blood alcohol concentration on Glasgow Coma Scale score and relation to computed tomography findings.中度和重度创伤性脑损伤:血液酒精浓度对格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的影响及其与计算机断层扫描结果的关系。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):211-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS14322.
5
An evaluation of outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury at a referral hospital in Tanzania: evidence from a survival analysis.坦桑尼亚转诊医院创伤性脑损伤患者结局评估:生存分析证据。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Nov 1;47(5):E6. doi: 10.3171/2019.7.FOCUS19316.
6
Glasgow Coma Scale score at intensive care unit discharge predicts the 1-year outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.重症监护病房出院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分可预测重度创伤性脑损伤患者的1年预后。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013 Jun;39(3):285-92. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0269-3. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
7
Hospital-acquired pneumonia is an independent predictor of poor global outcome in severe traumatic brain injury up to 5 years after discharge.医院获得性肺炎是重度创伤性脑损伤出院后长达5年全球预后不良的独立预测因素。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Feb;78(2):396-402. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000526.
8
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
9
Prediction of Global Functional Outcome and Post-Concussive Symptoms after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: External Validation of Prognostic Models in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.轻度创伤性脑损伤后全球功能结局和脑震荡后症状的预测:协作性欧洲神经创伤效应研究中的创伤性脑损伤(CENTER-TBI)研究中预后模型的外部验证。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Jan 15;38(2):196-209. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7074. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
10
Risk Adjustment In Neurocritical care (RAIN)--prospective validation of risk prediction models for adult patients with acute traumatic brain injury to use to evaluate the optimum location and comparative costs of neurocritical care: a cohort study.神经重症监护中的风险调整(RAIN)——前瞻性验证用于评估神经重症监护最佳位置和比较成本的成人急性创伤性脑损伤风险预测模型:一项队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17(23):vii-viii, 1-350. doi: 10.3310/hta17230.

引用本文的文献

1
Index of Consciousness monitoring may effectively predict and prevent circulatory stress induced by endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia: a prospective randomized controlled trial.意识监测指数可有效预测和预防全麻下经气管插管引起的循环应激:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Sep 6;24(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02701-8.
2
Nuclear Medicine Imaging Techniques in Glioblastomas.核医学成像技术在胶质母细胞瘤中的应用。
Neurochem Res. 2024 Nov;49(11):3006-3013. doi: 10.1007/s11064-024-04233-6. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
3
The effect of burst suppression on cerebral blood flow and autoregulation: a scoping review of the human and animal literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural oscillations track recovery of consciousness in acute traumatic brain injury patients.神经振荡追踪急性创伤性脑损伤患者意识的恢复。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Apr 15;43(6):1804-1820. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25725. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
2
A systematic investigation of the association between network dynamics in the human brain and the state of consciousness.对人类大脑网络动力学与意识状态之间关联的系统性研究。
Neurosci Conscious. 2020 Jun 14;2020(1):niaa008. doi: 10.1093/nc/niaa008. eCollection 2020.
3
Long-term outcomes in major trauma patients and correlations with the acute phase.
爆发抑制对脑血流量和自动调节的影响:对人类和动物文献的范围综述
Front Physiol. 2023 Jun 7;14:1204874. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1204874. eCollection 2023.
4
Review of Noninvasive Neuromonitoring Modalities in Children II: EEG, qEEG.儿童无创神经监测方式评估 II:脑电图、qEEG。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Dec;39(3):618-638. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01686-5. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
5
Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prognostic Parameter.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血中的非惊厥性癫痫持续状态:一项预后参数。
Brain Sci. 2023 Jan 22;13(2):184. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020184.
6
Protective down-regulated states in the human brain: A possible lesson from COVID-19.人类大脑中的保护性下调状态:可能从 COVID-19 中吸取的教训。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 16;119(46):e2120221119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120221119. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
7
Dynamic Variables of Electroencephalography may be a Window into Brain Responsiveness.脑电图的动态变量可能是洞察大脑反应性的一扇窗口。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Dec;37(3):618-619. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01487-2. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
8
A Validation Study for SHE Score for Acute Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly.老年急性硬膜下血肿SHE评分的验证研究
Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 26;12(8):981. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12080981.
重大创伤患者的长期预后及其与急性期的相关性。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Jan 13;15:6. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-0289-3. eCollection 2020.
4
Clinical neurophysiology for neurological prognostication of comatose patients after cardiac arrest.心脏骤停后昏迷患者神经预后评估的临床神经生理学
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2017 Mar 20;2:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2017.03.001. eCollection 2017.
5
Dynamic regimes of neocortical activity linked to corticothalamic integrity correlate with outcomes in acute anoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest.与皮质丘脑完整性相关的新皮质活动动态模式与心脏骤停后急性缺氧性脑损伤的预后相关。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017 Jan 6;4(2):119-129. doi: 10.1002/acn3.385. eCollection 2017 Feb.
6
Neurological prognostication of outcome in patients in coma after cardiac arrest.心脏骤停后昏迷患者的神经预后预测。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 May;15(6):597-609. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00015-6. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
7
Part 8: Post-Cardiac Arrest Care: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第8部分:心脏骤停后护理:2015年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南更新
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S465-82. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000262.
8
European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine 2015 guidelines for post-resuscitation care.欧洲复苏理事会和欧洲危重病医学会 2015 年后复苏护理指南。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Dec;41(12):2039-56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4051-3.
9
Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science.获得性脑损伤后的意识障碍:科学现状。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Feb;10(2):99-114. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.279. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
10
Burst suppression probability algorithms: state-space methods for tracking EEG burst suppression.突发抑制概率算法:用于跟踪脑电图突发抑制的状态空间方法。
J Neural Eng. 2013 Oct;10(5):056017. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056017. Epub 2013 Sep 10.