Genevière Joseph, McCallin Shawna, Huttner Angela, Pham Truong-Thanh, Suva Domizio
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
5Co-first authors and equal contributors.
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Dec 10;6(12):1148-1156. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210073. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Bone and joint infections are difficult to treat, and increasing antibiotic resistance has only made them more challenging. This has led to renewed interest in phage therapy (PT). The aim of this systematic review was to determine success rate, current treatment modalities and safety of PT in bone and joint infections.A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases as well as the journal for literature published between January 2000 and April 2021 was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify all human studies assessing bacteriophages as therapy for bone and joint infections. All study designs and patient populations were eligible. The review's primary outcome was success rate.Twenty records describing a total of 51 patients and 52 treatment episodes were included. No randomized controlled studies were identified. The overall success rate was 71% ( = 37/52). Topical administration alone was the most frequent administration route (85%, = 44/52). Antibiotics were administered concomitantly with PT in the majority of treatments (79%, = 41/52), and surgery was performed for 87% ( = 45/52) of treatment episodes. Four minor adverse events related to PT were reported, representing 8% ( = 4/52) of treatment episodes.PT for bone and joint infections has not been evaluated in any randomized controlled clinical study, and current administration modalities are highly variable between case reports and case series. While publications included here show potential benefit and few adverse effects, clinical trials are warranted to assess the efficacy of PT for bone and joint infections and determine optimal treatment modalities. Cite this article: 2021;6:1148-1156. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210073.
骨与关节感染难以治疗,而抗生素耐药性的增加更是使其治疗面临更大挑战。这使得人们对噬菌体疗法(PT)重新产生了兴趣。本系统评价的目的是确定噬菌体疗法在骨与关节感染中的成功率、当前治疗方式及安全性。
根据PRISMA指南,对PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库以及相关期刊进行了系统检索,以查找2000年1月至2021年4月期间发表的所有评估噬菌体作为骨与关节感染治疗方法的人体研究。所有研究设计和患者群体均符合条件。该评价的主要结局是成功率。
纳入了20篇记录,共描述了51例患者和52个治疗疗程。未检索到随机对照研究。总体成功率为71%(n = 37/52)。单纯局部给药是最常见的给药途径(85%,n = 44/52)。在大多数治疗中(79%,n = 41/52),抗生素与噬菌体疗法同时使用,87%(n = 45/52)的治疗疗程进行了手术。报告了4例与噬菌体疗法相关的轻微不良事件,占治疗疗程的8%(n = 4/52)。
尚未有随机对照临床研究评估噬菌体疗法用于骨与关节感染的情况,目前病例报告和病例系列之间的给药方式差异很大。虽然此处纳入的文献显示了潜在益处且不良反应较少,但仍有必要进行临床试验以评估噬菌体疗法治疗骨与关节感染的疗效并确定最佳治疗方式。引用本文:2021;6:1148 - 1156。DOI:10.1302/2058 - 5241.6.210073。