Khan Mohsin Ali, Farooq Furqan, Javed Mohammad Faisal, Zafar Adeel, Ostrowski Krzysztof Adam, Aslam Fahid, Malazdrewicz Seweryn, Maślak Mariusz
Department of Structural Engineering, Military College of Engineering (MCE), National University of Science and Technology (NUST), Sector H-12, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.
Department of Civil Engineering, CECOS University of IT and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 22;15(1):58. doi: 10.3390/ma15010058.
To avoid time-consuming, costly, and laborious experimental tests that require skilled personnel, an effort has been made to formulate the depth of wear of fly-ash concrete using a comparative study of machine learning techniques, namely random forest regression (RFR) and gene expression programming (GEP). A widespread database comprising 216 experimental records was constructed from available research. The database includes depth of wear as a response parameter and nine different explanatory variables, i.e., cement content, fly ash, water content, fine and coarse aggregate, plasticizer, air-entraining agent, age of concrete, and time of testing. The performance of the models was judged via statistical metrics. The GEP model gives better performance with R and equals 0.9667 and 0.0501 respectively and meet with the external validation criterion suggested in the previous literature. The k-fold cross-validation also verifies the accurateness of the model by evaluating R, RSE, MAE, and RMSE. The sensitivity analysis of GEP equation indicated that the time of testing is the influential parameter. The results of this research can help the designers, practitioners, and researchers to quickly estimate the depth of wear of fly-ash concrete thus shortening its ecological susceptibilities that push to sustainable and faster construction from the viewpoint of environmentally friendly waste management.
为避免进行需要熟练人员的耗时、昂贵且费力的实验测试,已努力通过对机器学习技术(即随机森林回归(RFR)和基因表达编程(GEP))的比较研究来确定粉煤灰混凝土的磨损深度。利用现有研究构建了一个包含216条实验记录的广泛数据库。该数据库将磨损深度作为响应参数,并包含九个不同的解释变量,即水泥含量、粉煤灰、含水量、细集料和粗集料、减水剂、引气剂、混凝土龄期和测试时间。通过统计指标来评判模型的性能。GEP模型表现更佳,R值和分别为0.