• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《评估成年人身体活动和久坐行为的 IPAQ-SF、GPAQ 和 EHIS-PAQ 斯洛文尼亚语版本的信度和效度》

Reliability and Validity of Slovenian Versions of IPAQ-SF, GPAQ, and EHIS-PAQ for Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentarism of Adults.

机构信息

Faculty of Sports, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Liberal Arts Department, General Education, American University of the Middle East, Egaila 54200, Kuwait.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 31;19(1):430. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010430.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19010430
PMID:35010686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8744779/
Abstract

Health policies rely on physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior data collected through PA questionnaires (PAQs). Validity of international PAQs varies among countries. Therefore, it is important to know the validity of the national versions of the PAQs to properly evaluate the results. We conducted a validation study of the Slovenian versions of the International PAQ Short Form (IPAQ-SF), the Global PAQ (GPAQ), and the PAQ used in the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS-PAQ) on 306 healthy adults. The most valid and reliable constructs in all tested were sedentary behavior and vigorous PA (VPA), however the criterion validity of these constructs was low (Spearman's ρ 0.38-0.45 for sedentary behavior and 0.34-0.42 for VPA). Moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) had low validity (0.26-0.29) despite being used as a standard measure of PA behavior. Participants over-reported MVPA for 17 to 156 min and underreported the sedentary behavior for more than two hours. The test-retest study found high reliability for sedentary behavior (0.69-0.81) and low to moderate reliability for PA behavior (0.42-0.76). The Slovenian versions of the observed PAQs are a useful tool for national PA surveillance, but for qualitative assessment of individual health-related PA behavior they should be combined with accelerometer-based devices.

摘要

健康政策依赖于通过体力活动问卷(PAQ)收集的体力活动(PA)和久坐行为数据。国际 PAQ 的有效性因国家而异。因此,了解 PAQ 国家版本的有效性对于正确评估结果非常重要。我们对 306 名健康成年人进行了斯洛文尼亚版国际体力活动问卷短表(IPAQ-SF)、全球体力活动问卷(GPAQ)和欧洲健康访谈调查体力活动问卷(EHIS-PAQ)的验证研究。在所有测试中,最有效和可靠的结构是久坐行为和剧烈体力活动(VPA),但这些结构的标准有效性较低(久坐行为的 Spearman ρ 为 0.38-0.45,VPA 为 0.34-0.42)。尽管被用作体力活动行为的标准衡量标准,但中度至剧烈体力活动(MVPA)的有效性较低(0.26-0.29)。参与者报告的 MVPA 多了 17 到 156 分钟,而报告的久坐行为则多了两个多小时。测试-重测研究发现,久坐行为的可靠性很高(0.69-0.81),而体力活动行为的可靠性则较低至中等(0.42-0.76)。观察到的 PAQ 的斯洛文尼亚版本是国家 PA 监测的有用工具,但对于个体健康相关体力活动行为的定性评估,它们应该与基于加速度计的设备结合使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c882/8744779/d53dcfe436cb/ijerph-19-00430-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c882/8744779/d53dcfe436cb/ijerph-19-00430-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c882/8744779/d53dcfe436cb/ijerph-19-00430-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of Slovenian Versions of IPAQ-SF, GPAQ, and EHIS-PAQ for Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentarism of Adults.《评估成年人身体活动和久坐行为的 IPAQ-SF、GPAQ 和 EHIS-PAQ 斯洛文尼亚语版本的信度和效度》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 31;19(1):430. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010430.
2
Reliability and Validity of Self-Reported Questionnaires Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Finland.芬兰自评问卷评估体力活动和久坐行为的信度和效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 27;21(6):686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060686.
3
Physical activity surveillance in the European Union: reliability and validity of the European Health Interview Survey-Physical Activity Questionnaire (EHIS-PAQ).欧盟的身体活动监测:欧洲健康访谈调查-身体活动问卷(EHIS-PAQ)的信度和效度
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 May 23;13:61. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0386-6.
4
Validity and Reliability of International Physical Activity Questionnaires for Adults across EU Countries: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.欧盟国家成年人国际体力活动问卷的有效性和可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 30;17(19):7161. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197161.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire among healthy Hungarian adults.全球体力活动问卷在健康匈牙利成年人中的跨文化调适和验证。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 17;20(Suppl 1):1056. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08477-z.
6
Assessment of physical activity in older Belgian adults: validity and reliability of an adapted interview version of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-L).比利时老年成年人身体活动评估:国际体力活动问卷长版(IPAQ-L)改编访谈版的效度和信度
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 28;15:433. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1785-3.
7
Reliability and Validity of the ONAPS Physical Activity Questionnaire in Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in French Adults.ONAPS 体力活动问卷评估法国成年人体力活动和久坐行为的可靠性和有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 25;18(11):5643. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115643.
8
The dilemma of physical activity questionnaires: Fitter people are less prone to over reporting.体力活动问卷的困境:更健康的人不太可能过度报告。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 30;18(8):e0285357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285357. eCollection 2023.
9
Evaluation of the Indian Migration Study Physical Activity Questionnaire (IMS-PAQ): a cross-sectional study.印度移民研究体力活动问卷(IMS-PAQ)评估:一项横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Feb 9;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-13.
10
Self-administered physical activity questionnaires for the elderly: a systematic review of measurement properties.老年人自我管理体力活动问卷:测量特性的系统评价。
Sports Med. 2010 Jul 1;40(7):601-23. doi: 10.2165/11531350-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation Study of a Screening Questionnaire to Identify People Who Are Physically Inactive.一份用于识别身体活动不足人群的筛查问卷的开发与验证研究
Public Health Chall. 2025 Feb 27;4(1):e70037. doi: 10.1002/puh2.70037. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Reliability and Validity of Self-Reported Questionnaires Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Finland.芬兰自评问卷评估体力活动和久坐行为的信度和效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 27;21(6):686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060686.
3
Correction: Meh et al. Reliability and Validity of Slovenian Versions of IPAQ-SF, GPAQ, and EHIS-PAQ for Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentarism of Adults. 2022, , 430.

本文引用的文献

1
European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) 2 - Background and study methodology.欧洲健康访谈调查(EHIS)2 - 背景与研究方法。
J Health Monit. 2019 Dec 11;4(4):66-79. doi: 10.25646/6228. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
An inventory of national surveillance systems assessing physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sport participation of adults in the European Union.评估欧盟成年人身体活动、久坐行为和参与运动情况的国家监测系统目录。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 7;21(1):1797. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11842-1.
3
Reliability and Validity of the ONAPS Physical Activity Questionnaire in Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in French Adults.
更正:梅赫等人。用于评估成年人身体活动和久坐行为的IPAQ-SF、GPAQ和EHIS-PAQ斯洛文尼亚语版本的信度和效度。2022年,第430页。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 29;21(4):417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040417.
4
The dilemma of physical activity questionnaires: Fitter people are less prone to over reporting.体力活动问卷的困境:更健康的人不太可能过度报告。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 30;18(8):e0285357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285357. eCollection 2023.
5
Functional characteristics and subjective disease perception in patients with COVID-19 two months after hospital discharge.新冠病毒感染患者出院两个月后的功能特征及主观疾病认知
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Jul 21;4:1209900. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1209900. eCollection 2023.
6
Changes in life satisfaction, depression, general health and sleep quality of Spanish older women during COVID-19 lockdown and their relationship with lifestyle: an observational follow-up study.COVID-19 封锁期间西班牙老年女性生活满意度、抑郁、一般健康和睡眠质量的变化及其与生活方式的关系:一项观察性随访研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 24;12(8):e061993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061993.
7
Exercise Motives of College Students after the COVID-19 Lockdown.新冠疫情封控后大学生的锻炼动机。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 7;19(12):6977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19126977.
8
Design and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess the Leisure Time Physical Activity of Adult Women in Gipuzkoa.设计并验证一份评估吉普斯夸成年女性休闲时间体力活动的问卷。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 8;19(9):5736. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095736.
ONAPS 体力活动问卷评估法国成年人体力活动和久坐行为的可靠性和有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 25;18(11):5643. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115643.
4
Validity and Reliability of IPAQ-SF and GPAQ for Assessing Sedentary Behaviour in Adults in the European Union: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.《评估欧盟成年人久坐行为的 IPAQ-SF 和 GPAQ 的有效性和可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;18(9):4602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094602.
5
Criterion validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Hungarian short form against the RM42 accelerometer.国际体力活动问卷匈牙利简表相对于RM42加速度计的效标效度和信度
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 23;21(Suppl 1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10372-0.
6
Intensity Paradox-Low-Fit People Are Physically Most Active in Terms of Their Fitness.强度悖论——低适应度人群在体能方面表现出最高的活跃度。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 15;21(6):2063. doi: 10.3390/s21062063.
7
Validity and Reliability of International Physical Activity Questionnaires for Adults across EU Countries: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.欧盟国家成年人国际体力活动问卷的有效性和可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 30;17(19):7161. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197161.
8
Show cards of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) - do they impact validity? A crossover study.展示全球体力活动问卷 (GPAQ) 的卡片-它们会影响有效性吗?一项交叉研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8312-x.
9
Do we have to reduce the recall period? Validity of a daily physical activity questionnaire (PAQ24) in young active adults.我们是否必须缩短回顾期?一种针对年轻活跃成年人的日常体力活动问卷(PAQ24)的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 16;20(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8165-3.
10
American College of Sports Medicine Roundtable Report on Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Cancer Prevention and Control.美国运动医学学院关于体力活动、久坐行为与癌症预防和控制的圆桌报告
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Nov;51(11):2391-2402. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002117.