Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Institute of Scientific and Technological Communication and Information in Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ICICT-FIOCRUZ), Biblioteca de Manguinhos suite 229, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, 21045-900, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03961-x.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing HCV infection rates in haemodialysis patients in Brazil (Prospero CRD #42021275068). We included studies on patients under haemodialysis, comprising both convenience samples and exhaustive information from selected services. Patients underwent HCV serological testing with or without confirmation by HCV RNA PCR. Exclusion criteria were the following: absence of primary empirical information and studies without information on their respective settings, study year, accurate infection rates, or full specification of diagnostic tests. Studies with samples ≤ 30 and serial assessments with repeated information were also excluded. Reference databases included PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science for the period 1989-2019. A systematic review was carried out, followed by two independent meta-analyses: (i) studies with data on HCV prevalence and (ii) studies with a confirmatory PCR (i.e., active infection), respectively. A comprehensive set of different methods and procedures were used: forest plots and respective statistics, polynomial regression, meta-regression, subgroup influence, quality assessment, and trim-and-fill analysis. 29 studies and 11,290 individuals were assessed. The average time patients were in haemodialysis varied from 23.5 to 56.3 months. Prevalence of HCV infection was highly heterogeneous, with a pronounced decrease from 1992 to 2001, followed by a plateau and a slight decrease in recent years. The summary measure for HCV prevalence was 34% (95% CI 26-43%) for studies implemented before 2001. For studies implemented after 2001, the corresponding summary measure was 11% (95% CI 8-15%). Estimates for prevalence of active HCV infection were also highly heterogeneous. There was a marked decline from 1996 to 2001, followed by a plateau and a slight increase after 2010. The summary measure for active HCV infection was 19% (95% CI 15-25%) in studies carried out before 2001. For studies implemented after 2001, the corresponding summary measure was 9% (95% CI 6-13%). Heterogeneity was pervasive, but different analyses helped to identify its underlying sources. Besides the year each study was conducted, the findings differed markedly between geographic regions and were heavily influenced by the size of the studies and publication biases. Our systematic review and meta-analysis documented a substantial decline in HCV prevalence among Brazilian haemodialysis patients from 1992 to 2015. CKD should be targeted with specific interventions to prevent HCV infection, and if prevention fails, prompt diagnosis and treatment. Although the goal of HCV elimination by 2030 in Brazil remains elusive, it is necessary to adopt measures to achieve micro-elimination and to launch initiatives towards targeted interventions to curb the spread of HCV in people with CKD, among other high-risk groups. This is of particular concern in the context of a protracted COVID-19 pandemic and a major economic and political crisis.
我们对巴西血液透析患者丙型肝炎病毒感染率的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析(Prospéro CRD #42021275068)。我们纳入了血液透析患者的研究,包括方便样本和从选定服务中获得的详尽信息。患者接受了 HCV 血清学检测,包括 HCV RNA PCR 确认。排除标准如下:缺乏原始实证信息,以及没有关于各自环境、研究年份、准确感染率或诊断检测完整说明的研究。样本量≤30 的研究和具有重复信息的系列评估也被排除在外。参考数据库包括 PubMed、LILACS、Scopus 和 Web of Science,时间跨度为 1989-2019 年。我们进行了系统评价,随后进行了两项独立的荟萃分析:(i)研究丙型肝炎病毒流行率的数据,(ii)具有确认性 PCR(即活动性感染)的研究。使用了一套全面的不同方法和程序:森林图及其各自的统计数据、多项式回归、荟萃回归、亚组影响、质量评估和修剪和填充分析。评估了 29 项研究和 11290 名个体。患者接受血液透析的平均时间从 23.5 到 56.3 个月不等。丙型肝炎病毒感染的流行率高度异质,从 1992 年到 2001 年显著下降,随后进入平台期,近年来略有下降。2001 年前实施的研究中丙型肝炎病毒流行率的汇总指标为 34%(95%CI 26-43%)。2001 年后实施的研究中丙型肝炎病毒流行率的汇总指标为 11%(95%CI 8-15%)。丙型肝炎病毒活动性感染的流行率也高度异质。从 1996 年到 2001 年,丙型肝炎病毒活动性感染的流行率显著下降,随后进入平台期,2010 年后略有上升。2001 年前实施的研究中丙型肝炎病毒活动性感染的汇总指标为 19%(95%CI 15-25%)。2001 年后实施的研究中丙型肝炎病毒活动性感染的汇总指标为 9%(95%CI 6-13%)。异质性普遍存在,但不同的分析有助于确定其潜在来源。除了每项研究进行的年份外,发现结果在地理区域之间存在显著差异,并且受到研究规模和发表偏倚的严重影响。我们的系统评价和荟萃分析记录了巴西血液透析患者丙型肝炎病毒感染率从 1992 年到 2015 年的大幅下降。应该针对慢性肾脏病采取具体干预措施来预防丙型肝炎病毒感染,如果预防失败,应及时诊断和治疗。尽管巴西到 2030 年消除丙型肝炎病毒的目标仍然难以实现,但有必要采取措施实现微观消除,并启动针对慢性肾脏病患者等高危人群的遏制丙型肝炎病毒传播的针对性干预措施。在 COVID-19 大流行和重大经济和政治危机的背景下,这一点尤其令人关切。